Charles Broom vs Kyle Kang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Broom vs K. Kang

Charles Broom
GBR
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
20
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
370
C. Rank
650
235
Best Rank
584
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$40.0K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Kyle Kang
USA
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
20
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
370
C. Rank
650
235
Best Rank
584
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$40.0K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Kang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Kyle Kang winning 1. The last match between Charles Broom and Kyle Kang was at the M25 Calabasas, 22-03-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broom | 1 |
| Kang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Calabasas(03-22-24)
Charles Broom
1
6
6
Kyle Kang
6
3
2
C. Broom vs K. Kang H2H Profile
C. Broom vs K. Kang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charles Broom has won 43.26% of points on their second serve, while Kyle Kang has won 45.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charles Broom, in recent form, has won 45.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kyle Kang has won 48.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.66% and 28.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charles Broom has saved 52.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kyle Kang has saved 49.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charles Broom has won 63.79% of matches played (W/L 37/21), with Kyle Kang winning 74.07% (W/L 20/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charles Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 25/22). Kyle Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 21/13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
- Player level: In the last year, Charles Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 79.41% of matches (W/L 27/7), where as Kyle Kang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 20/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Charles Broom winning 1 times and Kyle Kang being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Kyle Kang winning 1.
- The last match between Charles Broom and Kyle Kang was at the M25 Calabasas, 22-03-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charles Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 335.91 while Kyle Kang has played against players with an average rank of 149.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charles Broom has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kyle Kang has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charles Broom has converted 36.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kyle Kang has converted 44.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Charles Broom vs Kyle Kang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Broom vs K. Kang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:7:0 | Average Match Time | 2:7:0 |
| 70% (62/88) | 1st Serve % | 53% (39/74) |
| 60% (37/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (26/39) |
| 38% (10/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (5/14) |
| 49% (36/74) | Return Points Win % | 47% (41/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Broom 54%, Kang 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Broom 56%, Kang 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Broom 62%, Kang 53%.
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
K. Kang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(7) 6-3 | ||
F | W | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
SF | W | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||

C. Broom vs K. Kang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.17% (263/160) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.27% (81/58) |
| 59.58% (591/401) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.73% (180/143) |
| 54.00% (5054/4306) | Games Win/Loss | 52.07% (1612/1484) |
| 65.99% (130/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (60/40) |
| 66.67% (44/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.76% (21/13) |
| 56.64% (64/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 53.19% (25/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1782 | Aces Total | 334 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1040 | Total Double Faults | 267 |
| 1:28:4 | Average Match Time | 1:39:57 |
| 230.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 200.06 |
| 62% (15289/24616) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5163/8766) |
| 70% (10707/15289) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3470/5163) |
| 50% (4709/9326) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1842/3603) |
| 41% (1115/2698) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (397/929) |
| 41% (10721/26149) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3646/8864) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.76% (54/64) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 69.93% (207/89) | Futures W/L | 61.60% (77/48) |
| 62% (261/420) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (78/135) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (71/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (20/40) |
| 54% (79/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (25/43) |
| 87% (250/218) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (70/62) |
| 13% (250/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (70/8) |
| 26% (173/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (69/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 15/11/25
Prediction05:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:00 PM 15/11/25
PredictionPotential H2H Matches This Week
Broom (Drummondville Challenger)
Glinka vs BroomCould play in The Final
Kasnikowski vs BroomCould play in The Final
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Liam Broady vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
16:25
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
17:20
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal