Charles Broom vs Daisuke Sumizawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Sep at 01:43 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Broom vs D. Sumizawa

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Sumizawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Daisuke Sumizawa winning 0. The last match between Charles Broom and Daisuke Sumizawa was at the M25 Sapporo, 04-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Broom | 1 |
Sumizawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Sapporo(09-04-25)
C. Broom vs D. Sumizawa H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$39,970 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
62.20% (260-158) | Career Total W/L | 52.96% (215-191) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
8 | Titles | 1 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Broom vs D. Sumizawa Match Preview:
- Recently, Sumizawa has a slight upper hand on second serve points, winning 46.94% compared to Broom's 42.92%. This stat often correlates strongly with match outcomes.
- When receiving second serves, Broom edges out slightly with a 44.83% win rate against Sumizawa's 44.32%.
- In returning first serves, Broom again leads with 28.38% over Sumizawa at 26.06%. Could this make a difference?
- Under pressure, Broom saves more breakpoints at 54.48%, while Sumizawa saves 45.45%. Is this critical for tight matches?
- Overall match performance over the past year favors Sumizawa with a 62.3% win rate, compared to Broom's 57.14%.
- Surface preferences vary, with Sumizawa excelling on indoor hard courts (63%), while Broom performs best on clay (67%).
- Sumizawa has faced higher-ranked opponents on average compared to Broom, with ranks of 329.98 and 351.02, respectively.
- In deciding sets, Sumizawa wins 50% of the time, outperforming Broom's 39% success rate.
- Breakpoint conversion is higher for Sumizawa at 36.79%, compared to Broom's 31.93%—a potential advantage in crucial moments.
- Recent match levels show Broom competing at a higher winning percentage (72.22%) in lower-tier events, compared to Sumizawa's 62.3% in similar settings.
Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):
Sumizawa appears to have an edge with higher efficiency in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion. These could be pivotal in determining the match outcome. Sumizawa's slightly better track record against higher-ranked players also adds weight to their side.
Broom, while superior in returning serves and saving breakpoints under pressure, may find it challenging against Sumizawa's impressive deciding set record. This could tip the balance in closely contested rallies.
Given the recent statistics and performance factors, Sumizawa is likely to clinch the win in this upcoming tennis encounter.
Charles Broom vs Daisuke Sumizawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Broom vs D. Sumizawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:40:21 | Average Match Time | 1:40:21 |
63% (29/46) | 1st Serve % | 54% (35/65) |
76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
76% (13/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
49% (32/65) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/46) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
D. Sumizawa Recent Matches Played

C. Broom vs D. Sumizawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62.20% (260/158) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.96% (215/191) |
59.65% (584/395) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.56% (483/436) |
54.00% (4993/4253) | Games Win/Loss | 51.42% (4334/4094) |
65.99% (130/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.05% (158/129) |
66.67% (44/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.74% (43/51) |
56.48% (61/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.87% (14/9) |
53.19% (25/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
1749 | Aces Total | 665 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
1034 | Total Double Faults | 669 |
1:28:5 | Average Match Time | 1:1:21 |
384.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.21 |
62% (15108/24310) | 1st Serve % | 58% (8987/15588) |
70% (10568/15108) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6051/8987) |
50% (4634/9201) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3132/6600) |
41% (1100/2667) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (650/1476) |
41% (10594/25810) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6080/15375) |
25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
45.13% (51/62) | Challenger W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
69.93% (207/89) | Futures W/L | 53.67% (212/183) |
62% (258/415) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (210/399) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
52% (71/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (40/88) |
54% (77/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (54/110) |
87% (248/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (214/182) |
13% (248/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (214/31) |
26% (170/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (192/33) |