Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Cannon Kingsley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Kingsley analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Cannon Kingsley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 53% of points on his second serve, while Kingsley has won 55.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 55.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kingsley has won 53.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 23.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 65.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kingsley has saved 58.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 60.49% of matches played (W/L 49/ 32), with Kingsley winning 57.45% (W/L 27/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Kingsley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 22/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 40/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broom winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Broom winning 1 and Kingsley winning 2. The last match between Broom and Kingsley was at the M15 Lubbock, 01-10-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Kingsley have played a deciding set 1 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Kingsley 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 0, and Kingsley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 210.31 while Kingsley has played against players with an average rank of 209.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kingsley has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kingsley has converted 47.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 0 - 1 Kingsley
313
Rank
313
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
415
Rank
404
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
64% (205-117)
Career Total W/L
60% (99-67)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | Cannon Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (56/92) | 62% (51/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (40/56) | 75% (38/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (16/36) | 52% (16/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (28/82) | 39% (36/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Charles Broom
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Cannon Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (45/30) | 55% (11/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (379/341) | 53% (107/96) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 72% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.69 |
| Aces Total | 193 | 68 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:47 | 2:15:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 183.19 | 44 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1445/2243) | 70% (435/624) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1017/1445) | 73% (317/435) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (420/798) | 56% (106/189) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (96/260) | 47% (21/45) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (999/2437) | 37% (241/648) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 50% (2/1) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Finn Bass
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Masamichi Imamura
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Cannon Kingsley
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Mao
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
10
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
52 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Henry Searle
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
9
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
10
Aces
8
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
61 of
78)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
26 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Cannon Kingsley
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
33%
(
17 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
65 of
89)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
135)
125
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Cannon Kingsley
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Kingsley Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
