Chan-Yeong Oh vs Seungmin Park Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent forms of Oh and Park reveals a telling narrative in their impending tennis match. Over the past six months, Oh has excelled at winning second serve points, achieving a 46.73% success rate compared to Park's 35.78%. This statistic is closely linked to predicting match outcomes, and it underscores Oh's potential advantage.

When evaluating return game stats, Park edges a slight advantage on second serve returns, winning 44.71% of points, whereas Oh manages 39.94%. Despite this, their performance on first serve returns is closely contested, with Park slightly ahead at 29.13% to Oh's 28.46%. Nevertheless, the overall correlation suggests a slight inclination towards favoring one of them based on these numbers.

Oh has demonstrated a greater aptitude for withstanding pressure, saving 56% of breakpoints compared to Park's 47.13%. This aspect is critical in forecasting match dynamics and could be heavily considered in real-time betting scenarios.

Reviewing their overall performance from the past year, Oh has secured wins in 68.89% of matches played, boasting a win-loss statistic of 31/14. Park, contrarily, displays a 50% win rate with a 22/22 record. This disparity in success rates enhances Oh’s perceived superiority in their match-up.

Surface preferences may also play a role, with Oh achieving his best wins on clay at a rate of 69%, and Park performing best on indoor hard courts with a 50% success rate. In contrast, both players have weaker records on surfaces less suited to their playstyles, which could influence adaptability during the match.

Consistently competing in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Oh shows similar dominance in win rates indicative of his ahead capabilities even when considering the competitive level. When juxtaposed with Park’s comparable experience, Oh maintains a statistical edge.

Examining their direct head-to-head encounters provides further insights. Oh has triumphed in their sole previous match-up, securing both sets against Park. The match duration historically averaged 2 hours and 9 minutes, yet no match proceeded to a deciding set. Notably, Oh has outperformed in the tiebreak scenario, reinforcing his pressure dominance.

The level of opponents each player has faced is also noteworthy, with Oh encountering competitors with an average rank of 257.16, superior to Park’s average opponent ranking of 309.75. This further supports the prediction trend toward Oh prevailing.

Even when considering deciding set scenarios across all opponents, both players demonstrate decent performance, with Oh winning 53% of his deciding sets, while Park slightly exceeds him at 57%. Thus, if this match extends to a deciding set, the outcome could lean slightly in favor of Park, though other statistics suggest a different prediction.

Based on these statistical analyses and the key performance metrics examined, Oh emerges as the predicted winner for the upcoming match. His superior consistency, experience against higher-ranked opponents, and proven head-to-head performance against Park tilt the expectation towards his advantage.