Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Kilian Feldbausch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wong vs Feldbausch analysis and find out who is favored!
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Kilian Feldbausch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Feldbausch has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 49.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Feldbausch has won 58.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.27% and 39.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 63.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Feldbausch has saved 56.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 67.07% of matches played (W/L 55/ 27), with Feldbausch winning 56.76% (W/L 21/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 79/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Feldbausch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 33/ 11), where as Feldbausch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 12/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.7 while Feldbausch has played against players with an average rank of 277.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Feldbausch has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 34.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Feldbausch has converted 47.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 0 Feldbausch
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
188
Rank
188
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
422
Rank
409
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
58% (100-73)
Career Total W/L
53% (34-30)
50% (9-9)
YTD W/L
80% (4-1)
$23,250
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wong VS Feldbausch H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Kilian Feldbausch |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (9/9) | 80% (4/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) | 67% (8/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (228/224) | 53% (60/53) |
Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.14 |
Aces Total | 127 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.54 |
DFs Total | 51 | 30 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:58 | 1:52:59 |
Avg Opp Rank | 345.17 | 343 |
1st Serve % | 56% (801/1440) | 67% (238/354) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (596/801) | 60% (142/238) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (316/639) | 46% (53/116) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (44/131) | 56% (25/45) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (559/1488) | 48% (174/362) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 80% (4/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 75% (3/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 67% (3/2) |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Alexander Blockx
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Laslo Djere
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jan Choinski
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
9
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
5
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
36 of
43)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yuta Shimizu
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Kilian Feldbausch Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
89%
(
40 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Alex Marti Pujolras
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
11
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(5) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
87%
(
77 of
89)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Daniel Rincon
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve %
72%
(
13 of
18)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
20
Total Points Won
15
|
4-2 ret. | H2H |
view more