Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Kasidit Samrej Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs K. Samrej

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

421

128

Best Rank

346

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

Plays

Kasidit Samrej

THA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

421

128

Best Rank

346

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 1 Samrej

They have played 5 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 3 and Kasidit Samrej winning 2. The last match between Kasidit Samrej and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Seoul Challenger, 31-10-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Kasidit Samrej getting the victory 6-7(1) 7-5 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	1
Samrej	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Seoul Challenger(10-31-24)

Stats

Kasidit Samrej

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

(R1) Nonthaburi 4 Challenger(09-24-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Kasidit Samrej

C. L. C. Wong vs K. Samrej H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	K. Samrej
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$0
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	56.36% (155-120)
1	Hard	1
2	Titles	6
1	Total H2H Matches	1
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

C. L. C. Wong vs K. Samrej Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.53% of points on their second serve, while Kasidit Samrej has won 45.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kasidit Samrej has won 45.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.77% and 25.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kasidit Samrej has saved 54.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Kasidit Samrej winning 60.26% (W/L 47/31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Kasidit Samrej has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 23/9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Kasidit Samrej has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 22/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 times and Kasidit Samrej being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 3 and Kasidit Samrej winning 2.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Kasidit Samrej was at the Seoul Challenger, 31-10-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Kasidit Samrej getting the victory 6-7(1) 7-5 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:26.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.05 while Kasidit Samrej has played against players with an average rank of 416.03.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kasidit Samrej has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kasidit Samrej has converted 33.60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Kasidit Samrej Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs K. Samrej H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	K. Samrej
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
28	Games Won	26
22	Aces (Total)	8
9	Total Double Faults	9
2:12:26	Average Match Time	2:12:26
58% (103/179)	1st Serve %	52% (101/193)
74% (76/103)	1st Serve Win %	70% (71/101)
49% (37/76)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (45/92)
25% (6/24)	Break Pts Won %	31% (5/16)
40% (77/193)	Return Points Win %	37% (66/179)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

K. Samrej Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Yokohama Challenger - 17-11-2025
R1 Rei SakamotoR. Sakamoto	L	6-4 7-6(1)	Stats
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
Q3 Igor Ribeiro MarcondesI. Ribeiro	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Q1 Michael VrbenskyM. Vrbensky	W	6-0 2-6 7-6(4)	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Akira SantillanA. Santillan	L	6-3 7-6(13)	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
QF Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs K. Samrej Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	K. Samrej
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	56.36% (155/120)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	56.89% (351/266)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	52.49% (3077/2785)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	54.55% (132/110)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	71.88% (23/9)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.55
1687	Aces Total	1572
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.31
603	Total Double Faults	895
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:35:4
371.21	Average Opponent Rank	471.52
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	61% (10352/16937)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	72% (7473/10352)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (3277/6585)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (647/1567)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	39% (6387/16532)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	25.00% (2/6)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	46.05% (35/41)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	62.11% (118/72)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (149/259)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (42/80)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (31/73)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (159/135)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (159/24)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (115/20)