Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Ethan Quinn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs E. Quinn

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

149

C. Rank

128

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$793.9K

Plays

Ethan Quinn

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

149

C. Rank

128

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$793.9K

Plays

Head-to-head: Wong 2 - 0 Quinn

They have played 4 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4 and Ethan Quinn winning 0. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn was at the Lincoln Challenger, 06-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	2
Quinn	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Lincoln Challenger(08-06-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ethan Quinn

(QF) Tyler Challenger(06-07-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ethan Quinn

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Quinn H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	E. Quinn
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$793,915
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	57.89% (132-96)
2	Hard	0
2	Titles	4
2	Total H2H Matches	0
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	40.00% (12-18)

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Quinn Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.85% of points on their second serve, while Ethan Quinn has won 50.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ethan Quinn has won 44.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.81% and 21.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ethan Quinn has saved 56.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Ethan Quinn winning 61.11% (W/L 44/28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Ethan Quinn has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 31/20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 19/17).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Ethan Quinn has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 times and Ethan Quinn being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4 and Ethan Quinn winning 0.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn was at the Lincoln Challenger, 06-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:42.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 204.77 while Ethan Quinn has played against players with an average rank of 141.85.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ethan Quinn has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ethan Quinn has converted 29.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Ethan Quinn Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Quinn H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	E. Quinn
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	8
16	Aces (Total)	2
3	Total Double Faults	7
1:17:42	Average Match Time	1:17:42
63% (68/108)	1st Serve %	54% (65/120)
76% (52/68)	1st Serve Win %	60% (39/65)
50% (20/40)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (24/55)
42% (8/19)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/4)
48% (57/120)	Return Points Win %	33% (36/108)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

E. Quinn Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
R1 Karen KhachanovK. Khachanov	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q3 Botic Van De ZandschulpB. Van	W	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Ugo BlanchetU. Blanchet	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Erste Bank Open - Vienna - 20-10-2025
Q3 Damir DzumhurD. Dzumhur	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Vit KoprivaV. Kopriva	W	4-6 6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Quinn Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	E. Quinn
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	57.89% (132/96)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	54.74% (300/248)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	51.61% (2811/2636)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	58.46% (76/54)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	52.78% (19/17)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	60.78% (31/20)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	54.55% (6/5)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.45
1687	Aces Total	1198
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.24
603	Total Double Faults	651
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:48:18
369.61	Average Opponent Rank	325.33
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	60% (10162/16932)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	71% (7236/10162)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (3433/6770)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (598/1496)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	38% (6402/16834)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	56.25% (9/7)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	59.09% (13/9)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	48.72% (19/20)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	54.84% (51/42)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	68.97% (40/18)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (128/219)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	43% (3/7)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (55/94)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (49/83)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (125/107)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (125/18)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (103/24)