Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Dino Prizmic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs D. Prizmic

Chak Lam Coleman Wong
HKG
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
21
Age
20
-
Height
-
160
C. Rank
117
128
Best Rank
115
0
Total Title
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$539.0K
Career Money
$308.7K
-
Plays
-

Dino Prizmic
CRO
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
21
Age
20
-
Height
-
160
C. Rank
117
128
Best Rank
115
0
Total Title
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$539.0K
Career Money
$308.7K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 0 Prizmic
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Wong | 0 |
Prizmic | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
no past h2h happened.
C. L. C. Wong vs D. Prizmic H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$538,970 | Career Prize Money | $308,745 |
55.32% (156-126) | Career Total W/L | 66.32% (126-64) |
2 | Titles | 8 |
45.45% (5-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (4-4) |
C. L. C. Wong vs D. Prizmic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.02% of points on their second serve, while Dino Prizmic has won 44.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dino Prizmic has won 45.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.88% and 24.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 53.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dino Prizmic has saved 48.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/33), with Dino Prizmic winning 70.31% (W/L 45/19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 124/87), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Dino Prizmic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 36/10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/18), where as Dino Prizmic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.70% of matches (W/L 38/15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.75 while Dino Prizmic has played against players with an average rank of 226.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dino Prizmic has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 37.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dino Prizmic has converted 32.90% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Dino Prizmic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Wong 51%, Prizmic 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Wong 47%, Prizmic 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Wong 59%, Prizmic 62%.
C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played
D. Prizmic Recent Matches Played

C. L. C. Wong vs D. Prizmic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55.32% (156/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.32% (126/64) |
53.64% (354/306) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.62% (268/160) |
51.08% (3265/3127) | Games Win/Loss | 55.75% (2163/1717) |
58.77% (124/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 78.26% (36/10) |
46.51% (20/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.84% (59/32) |
42.86% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.82% (30/21) |
42.86% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
1579 | Aces Total | 584 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
578 | Total Double Faults | 503 |
1:31:31 | Average Match Time | 1:48:18 |
364 | Average Opponent Rank | 362.02 |
60% (10797/17851) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7407/12286) |
71% (7655/10797) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5049/7407) |
49% (3440/7054) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2519/4879) |
41% (671/1646) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (660/1446) |
38% (6875/17908) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5350/12305) |
53.33% (8/7) | Slam W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
46.67% (7/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
62.50% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
27.27% (3/8) | Main Tour W/L | 55.56% (10/8) |
54.46% (61/51) | Challenger W/L | 65.49% (74/39) |
59.50% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 79.07% (34/9) |
54% (149/274) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (121/183) |
83% (5/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
54% (51/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (11/31) |
54% (49/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (29/48) |
86% (148/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (121/112) |
14% (148/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (121/9) |
20% (134/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (69/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:00 PM 03/10/25
Prediction
W1
1.71
W2
2.04
03:45 PM 03/10/25
Prediction
W1
1.22
W2
4.3
05:10 PM 03/10/25
Prediction
W1
3.02
W2
1.333
07:30 AM 04/10/25
Prediction
W1
1.5
W2
2.59
07:00 PM 03/10/25
Prediction
W1
1.52
W2
2.4
07:30 AM 04/10/25
Prediction
W1
3.64
W2
1.285
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
04:00
H2H 3-2
07:30
H2H 0-4
07:30
H2H 1-2
07:30
H2H 0-2
07:30
H2H 2-0