Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Daniel Evans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs D. Evans

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

151

C. Rank

188

128

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$5.2M

Plays

Right-Handed

Daniel Evans

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

151

C. Rank

188

128

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$5.2M

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Evans

They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Daniel Evans winning 0. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Daniel Evans was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 26-09-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	1
Evans	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Nonthaburi 4 Challenger(09-26-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Daniel Evans

C. L. C. Wong vs D. Evans H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	D. Evans
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$5,215,870
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	58.90% (589-411)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	24
1	Total H2H Matches	0
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	53.85% (7-6)

C. L. C. Wong vs D. Evans Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.53% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Evans has won 43.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Evans has won 47.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.77% and 26.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Evans has saved 54.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Daniel Evans winning 46.81% (W/L 22/25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Daniel Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 169/104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Daniel Evans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 times and Daniel Evans being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Daniel Evans winning 0.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Daniel Evans was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 26-09-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:38.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.05 while Daniel Evans has played against players with an average rank of 222.17.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Evans has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Evans has converted 39.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Daniel Evans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs D. Evans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	D. Evans
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	9
10	Aces (Total)	2
2	Total Double Faults	3
2:7:38	Average Match Time	2:7:38
64% (56/87)	1st Serve %	43% (31/72)
64% (36/56)	1st Serve Win %	61% (19/31)
55% (17/31)	2nd Serve Win %	54% (22/41)
33% (4/12)	Break Pts Won %	18% (2/11)
43% (31/72)	Return Points Win %	39% (34/87)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Evans Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
QF Juan Manuel CerundoloJ. Manuel	L	4-6 1-2 ret.	Stats
R2 Oliver CrawfordO. Crawford	W	3-6 7-6(7) 6-1	Stats
R1 Charles ChenC. Chen	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Shanghai Challenger - 01-09-2025
R2 Filip PeliwoF. Peliwo	L	6-4 3-6 2-2 ret.	Stats
R1 Linang XiaoL. Xiao	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs D. Evans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	D. Evans
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	58.90% (589/411)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	56.88% (1398/1060)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	52.28% (12366/11289)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	60.91% (254/163)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	46.15% (54/63)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	61.56% (181/113)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	58.14% (100/72)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.24
1687	Aces Total	2819
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
603	Total Double Faults	2037
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:8:24
371.21	Average Opponent Rank	493.87
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	61% (30518/50133)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	71% (21652/30518)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (9937/19614)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (1902/4621)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	38% (19172/50158)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	51.61% (48/45)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	41.77% (33/46)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	43.48% (20/26)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	52.56% (113/102)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	61.23% (169/107)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	70.93% (205/84)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (545/902)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	46% (40/87)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (189/359)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (184/339)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (581/492)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (581/86)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (418/99)