Prediction of Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Arthur De Greef Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs A. De Greef

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

143

C. Rank

Ret.

128

Best Rank

113

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$140.2K

Plays

Right-Handed

Arthur De Greef

BEL

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

143

C. Rank

Ret.

128

Best Rank

113

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$140.2K

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 1 Greef

They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0 and Arthur De Greef winning 2. The last match between Arthur De Greef and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the M15 Hong Kong, 09-01-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Arthur De Greef getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	0
Greef	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) M15 Hong Kong(01-09-20)

Stats

Arthur De Greef

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

C. L. C. Wong vs A. D. Greef H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	A. D. Greef
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$140,200
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	59.71% (372-251)
0	Hard	1
2	Titles	12
0	Total H2H Matches	1
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. L. C. Wong vs A. D. Greef Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 47.03% of points on their second serve, while Arthur De Greef has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Arthur De Greef has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.73% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arthur De Greef has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 50.77% of matches played (W/L 33/32), with Arthur De Greef winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Arthur De Greef has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 318/190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/18), where as Arthur De Greef has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0 times and Arthur De Greef being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 0 and Arthur De Greef winning 2.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Arthur De Greef was at the M15 Hong Kong, 09-01-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Arthur De Greef getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.98 while Arthur De Greef has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arthur De Greef has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arthur De Greef has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Arthur De Greef Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs A. D. Greef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	A. D. Greef
0	H2H Matches Won	1
0	Sets Won	2
7	Games Won	12
5	Aces (Total)	6
3	Total Double Faults	1
1:19:0	Average Match Time	1:19:0
64% (37/58)	1st Serve %	63% (37/59)
78% (29/37)	1st Serve Win %	76% (28/37)
33% (7/21)	2nd Serve Win %	64% (14/22)
0% (0/0)	Break Pts Won %	40% (2/5)
29% (17/59)	Return Points Win %	38% (22/58)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

A. D. Greef Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open Qualifying - Doha - 11-01-2021
Q1 Mohamed SafwatM. Safwat	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Alicante Challenger - 12-10-2020
Q3 Malek JaziriM. Jaziri	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
Q1 Vit KoprivaV. Kopriva	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
M25 Pardubice - 28-09-2020
R1 Petr NouzaP. Nouza	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
French Open - Paris - 28-09-2020
Q1 Tommy RobredoT. Robredo	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs A. D. Greef Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	A. D. Greef
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	59.71% (372/251)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	58.07% (824/595)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	52.65% (7022/6316)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	50.94% (27/26)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	62.60% (318/190)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.83% (26/32)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	25.00% (1/3)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.17
1687	Aces Total	1099
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.14
603	Total Double Faults	904
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1st Match
367.25	Average Opponent Rank	621.4
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	58% (14002/24035)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	67% (9397/14002)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (4913/10033)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (1047/2493)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	41% (9746/23974)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	34.78% (8/15)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/2)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	55.00% (11/9)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	52.16% (145/133)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	69.33% (208/92)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (358/595)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	43% (3/7)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (110/187)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (96/185)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (365/319)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (365/46)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (258/52)