C. L. C. Wong
To Win
G. Onclin
To Win
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Alex De Minaur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L W W L L
Form
W L W W W L W W L WHead-2-Head: Wong 0 - 0 Minaur
| Wong | Stats | Minaur |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (23-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 169 | Ranking | 7 |
| 128 | Highest Rank | 6 |
| 20 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 11 |
| 56% (139-110) | Career Total W/L | 64% (388-216) |
| $225,210 | Career Prize Money | $11,546,085 |
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / Third
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alex De Minaur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Alex De Minaur
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
14 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Alex De Minaur
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
89
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Daniil Medvedev
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Alex De Minaur
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Joao Fonseca
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (139/110) | Win/Loss | 64% (388/216) |
| 54% (311/269) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (920/600) |
| 51% (2855/2734) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7718/6630) |
| 59% (115/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (183/91) |
| 50% (18/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (71/53) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (83/49) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 69% (51/23) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1315 | Aces Total | 2063 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 502 | Total Double Faults | 1506 |
| 1:30:16 | Average Match Time | 1:44:27 |
| 379.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 281.78 |
| 60% (9202/15310) | 1st Serve % | 59% (25304/43219) |
| 71% (6508/9202) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17822/25321) |
| 48% (2957/6108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (9568/17930) |
| 40% (583/1449) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1901/4411) |
| 39% (5978/15446) | Return Points Win % | 40% (17967/44601) |
| 33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 64% (54/31) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 54% (59/50) |
| 63% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 60% (21/14) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 67% (147/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 55% (53/44) | Challenger W/L | 67% (52/26) |
| 60% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 74% (55/19) |
| 55% (134/244) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (319/500) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 65% (64/98) |
| 55% (45/82) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (120/216) |
| 57% (46/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (103/177) |
| 88% (129/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (367/322) |
| 12% (129/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (367/45) |
| 21% (120/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (237/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
