Chad Kissell vs Jake Van Emburgh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kissell vs J. Van Emburgh

Chad Kissell
USA
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Jake Van Emburgh
USA
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kissell 1 - 0 Emburgh
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chad Kissell winning 2 and Jake Van Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Chad Kissell and Jake Van Emburgh was at the M15 Edmond, 25-01-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Chad Kissell getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kissell | 1 |
| Emburgh | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Edmond(01-25-23)
Chad Kissell
7
6
Jake Van Emburgh
5
3
C. Kissell vs J. V. Emburgh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.54% (68-59) | Career Total W/L | 49.18% (90-93) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kissell vs J. V. Emburgh Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chad Kissell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jake Van Emburgh has won 49.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chad Kissell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jake Van Emburgh has won 49.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 23.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chad Kissell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jake Van Emburgh has saved 47.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chad Kissell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jake Van Emburgh winning 43.48% (W/L 10/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chad Kissell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 51/39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 7/10). Jake Van Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 62/55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 13/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Chad Kissell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jake Van Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chad Kissell winning 1 times and Jake Van Emburgh being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chad Kissell winning 2 and Jake Van Emburgh winning 0.
- The last match between Chad Kissell and Jake Van Emburgh was at the M15 Edmond, 25-01-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Chad Kissell getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chad Kissell has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jake Van Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chad Kissell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jake Van Emburgh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chad Kissell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jake Van Emburgh has converted 20.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Chad Kissell vs Jake Van Emburgh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kissell vs J. V. Emburgh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:43:0 | Average Match Time | 1:43:0 |
| 57% (41/72) | 1st Serve % | 65% (43/66) |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (30/43) |
| 45% (14/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 44% (29/66) | Return Points Win % | 39% (28/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kissell 0%, Emburgh 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kissell 0%, Emburgh 45%.
Break Points Saved %: Kissell 0%, Emburgh 54%.
C. Kissell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-4 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(2) 6-3 | ||
J. V. Emburgh Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

C. Kissell vs J. V. Emburgh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.54% (68/59) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.18% (90/93) |
| 53.66% (154/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.89% (199/208) |
| 51.76% (1445/1347) | Games Win/Loss | 49.35% (1935/1986) |
| 56.67% (51/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.99% (62/55) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (15/18) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.39% (13/20) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 314 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 205 | Total Double Faults | 258 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 257.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 82.33 |
| 57% (2512/4428) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3767/6474) |
| 69% (1744/2512) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2457/3767) |
| 45% (860/1916) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1215/2707) |
| 42% (149/357) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (206/489) |
| 38% (1586/4222) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2271/6216) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 53.54% (68/59) | Futures W/L | 49.45% (90/92) |
| 53% (67/126) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (90/183) |
| 33% (11/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (23/45) |
| 44% (15/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 84% (73/61) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (87/77) |
| 16% (73/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (87/10) |
| 13% (54/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (96/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 22 Nov, 01:10 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:35 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-1
04:10
H2H 1-1
20:00
H2H 0-1
18:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA-BEL
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia