Cem Ilkel vs Viktor Durasovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs V. Durasovic

Cem Ilkel

TUR

4

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

590

C. Rank

242

144

Best Rank

222

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$18.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Viktor Durasovic

NOR

4

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

590

C. Rank

242

144

Best Rank

222

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$18.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ilkel 4 - 0 Durasovic

They have played 10 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 8 and Viktor Durasovic winning 2. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Viktor Durasovic was at the Lugano Challenger, 06-03-2023, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ilkel	4
Durasovic	0

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(Q3) Lugano Challenger(03-06-23)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Viktor Durasovic

(R2) Bergamo Challenger(02-18-20)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Viktor Durasovic

(R1) Quimper Challenger(01-27-20)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Viktor Durasovic

C. Ilkel vs V. Durasovic H2H Profile

C. Ilkel	Stats	V. Durasovic
$225,530	Career Prize Money	$18,580
56.52% (438-337)	Career Total W/L	53.92% (406-347)
4	Indoor	0
7	Titles	9
4	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	50.00% (1-1)

C. Ilkel vs V. Durasovic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Viktor Durasovic has won 47.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Viktor Durasovic has won 45.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 24.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Viktor Durasovic has saved 54.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Viktor Durasovic winning 50.00% (W/L 33/33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Viktor Durasovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 185/114), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Viktor Durasovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.45% of matches (W/L 31/27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 4 times and Viktor Durasovic being victorious 0 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 8 and Viktor Durasovic winning 2.
The last match between Cem Ilkel and Viktor Durasovic was at the Lugano Challenger, 06-03-2023, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:27.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.52 while Viktor Durasovic has played against players with an average rank of 296.23.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Viktor Durasovic has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Viktor Durasovic has converted 35.80% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cem Ilkel vs Viktor Durasovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ilkel vs V. Durasovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ilkel	Stats	V. Durasovic
4	H2H Matches Won	0
8	Sets Won	2
56	Games Won	38
37	Aces (Total)	23
7	Total Double Faults	2
1:32:27	Average Match Time	1:32:27
68% (192/281)	1st Serve %	65% (178/274)
75% (144/192)	1st Serve Win %	64% (114/178)
46% (41/89)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (48/96)
57% (16/28)	Break Pts Won %	35% (7/20)
41% (112/274)	Return Points Win %	34% (96/281)
100% (4/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/4)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (2/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

V. Durasovic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R1 Lorenzo SciahbasiL. Sciahbasi	L	3-6 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Lyon Challenger - 10-11-2025
R2 Kyrian JacquetK. Jacquet	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R1 Shintaro MochizukiS. Mochizuki	W	6-4 4-6 6-3	Stats
Q3 Stefanos SakellaridisS. Sakellaridis	W	6-7(3) 6-3 7-5	Stats
Q1 Timothee LustigT. Lustig	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel vs V. Durasovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ilkel	Stats	V. Durasovic
56.52% (438/337)	YTD Win/Loss	53.92% (406/347)
54.63% (979/813)	Sets Win/Loss	52.73% (936/839)
51.54% (8791/8267)	Games Win/Loss	51.03% (8768/8414)
61.41% (288/181)	Hard Win/Loss	61.87% (185/114)
44.53% (57/71)	Clay Win/Loss	47.58% (118/130)
54.76% (92/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.74% (103/100)
10.00% (1/9)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.36
2865	Aces Total	3009
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
1385	Total Double Faults	1937
1:15:9	Average Match Time	1:25:55
561.57	Average Opponent Rank	497.28
58% (24152/41308)	1st Serve %	59% (27283/46579)
70% (16999/24152)	1st Serve Win %	70% (19194/27283)
51% (8757/17156)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (9798/19296)
40% (1622/4023)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1687/4245)
39% (16247/41803)	Return Points Win %	38% (17618/46284)
31.82% (7/15)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/2)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
31.82% (7/15)	Cups W/L	35.48% (11/20)
17.86% (5/23)	Main Tour W/L	30.00% (6/14)
52.23% (176/161)	Challenger W/L	47.59% (148/163)
66.39% (241/122)	Futures W/L	61.95% (241/148)
56% (426/756)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (398/740)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (5/10)
53% (147/275)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (147/279)
56% (130/233)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (136/258)
85% (424/362)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (389/332)
14% (424/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (389/56)
21% (350/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (364/73)