Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Viktor Durasovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Durasovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Viktor Durasovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.17% of points on his second serve, while Durasovic has won 51.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Durasovic has won 52.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.46% and 33.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 50.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Durasovic has saved 53.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40.82% of matches played (W/L 20/ 29), with Durasovic winning 46.88% (W/L 30/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Durasovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 166/ 98), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Durasovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 15/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Ilkel winning 4 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 8 and Durasovic winning 2. The last match between Ilkel and Durasovic was at the Lugano Challenger, 06-03-2023, Q3, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Durasovic have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ilkel winning 2 times and Durasovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Durasovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 213 while Durasovic has played against players with an average rank of 246.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Durasovic has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 42.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Durasovic has converted 41.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 4 - 0 Durasovic
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
4
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
4
Indoor0
0
Grass0
489
Rank
298
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
56% (401-311)
Career Total W/L
54% (344-295)
43% (9-12)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$14,785
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Viktor Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 2 |
| Games Won | 56 | 38 |
| Aces (Total) | 37 | 23 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:27 | 1:32:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (192/281) | 65% (178/274) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (144/192) | 64% (114/178) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (41/89) | 50% (48/96) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (16/28) | 35% (7/20) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (112/274) | 34% (96/281) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Viktor Durasovic
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Viktor Durasovic
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Viktor Durasovic
72%
(
72 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
13
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Viktor Durasovic
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Viktor Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (19/27) | 54% (43/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (189/227) | 51% (395/378) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 67% (8/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 60% (6/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 100 | 140 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.19 | 247.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (710/1232) | 58% (1364/2343) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (503/710) | 69% (937/1364) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (243/522) | 51% (504/979) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (37/89) | 41% (104/251) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (438/1209) | 41% (998/2445) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 50% (6/6) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (2/4) | 60% (12/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 28% (18/5) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Viktor Durasovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matija Pecotic
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Alex Rybakov
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Viktor Durasovic
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Durasovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
