Prediction of Cem Ilkel vs Roman Khassanov Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs R. Khassanov

Cem Ilkel

TUR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

586

C. Rank

Ret.

144

Best Rank

671

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Roman Khassanov

KAZ

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

586

C. Rank

Ret.

144

Best Rank

671

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 1 Khassanov

They have played 5 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 3 and Roman Khassanov winning 2. The last match between Roman Khassanov and Cem Ilkel was at the Samarkand Challenger, 07-05-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Roman Khassanov getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ilkel	1
Khassanov	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Samarkand Challenger(05-07-16)

Stats

Roman Khassanov

Cem Ilkel

(R1) Turkey F41(11-17-14)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Roman Khassanov

C. Ilkel vs R. Khassanov H2H Profile

C. Ilkel	Stats	R. Khassanov
$225,530	Career Prize Money	$0
56.52% (438-337)	Career Total W/L	44.03% (107-136)
0	Clay	1
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Ilkel vs R. Khassanov Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 67.50% of points on their second serve, while Roman Khassanov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 45.90% of their opponent's second serve points, while Roman Khassanov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 14.43% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Roman Khassanov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Roman Khassanov winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Roman Khassanov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 46/54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 5/14).
Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Roman Khassanov has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 1 times and Roman Khassanov being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 3 and Roman Khassanov winning 2.
The last match between Cem Ilkel and Roman Khassanov was at the Samarkand Challenger, 07-05-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Roman Khassanov getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:6.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.21 while Roman Khassanov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Roman Khassanov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 12.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Roman Khassanov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cem Ilkel vs Roman Khassanov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ilkel vs R. Khassanov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ilkel	Stats	R. Khassanov
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
20	Games Won	19
5	Aces (Total)	2
1	Total Double Faults	5
0:51:6	Average Match Time	0:51:6
59% (46/78)	1st Serve %	45% (32/71)
52% (24/46)	1st Serve Win %	75% (24/32)
41% (13/32)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (20/39)
38% (3/8)	Break Pts Won %	64% (7/11)
38% (27/71)	Return Points Win %	53% (41/78)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

R. Khassanov Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Shymkent - 08-04-2019
Q1 Sanetulla KutybaevS. Kutybaev	L	w/o	Stats
Tashkent Challenger - 08-10-2018
Q2 Jose StathamJ. Statham	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Q1 Vladyslav ManafovV. Manafov	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Almaty Challenger - 01-10-2018
Q2 Khumoun SultanovK. Sultanov	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Q1 Grigoriy LomakinG. Lomakin	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel vs R. Khassanov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ilkel	Stats	R. Khassanov
56.52% (438/337)	YTD Win/Loss	44.03% (107/136)
54.63% (979/813)	Sets Win/Loss	44.51% (235/293)
51.54% (8791/8267)	Games Win/Loss	47.44% (2214/2453)
61.41% (288/181)	Hard Win/Loss	45.16% (56/68)
44.53% (57/71)	Clay Win/Loss	46.00% (46/54)
54.76% (92/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	26.32% (5/14)
10.00% (1/9)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.08
2865	Aces Total	176
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
1385	Total Double Faults	415
1:15:9	Average Match Time	1st Match
560.68	Average Opponent Rank	531.94
58% (24152/41308)	1st Serve %	60% (4464/7382)
70% (16999/24152)	1st Serve Win %	62% (2762/4464)
51% (8757/17156)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1388/2918)
40% (1622/4023)	Break Points Won % (Total)	45% (311/686)
39% (16247/41803)	Return Points Win %	39% (2756/7103)
31.82% (7/15)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
31.82% (7/15)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
17.86% (5/23)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
52.23% (176/161)	Challenger W/L	35.48% (11/20)
66.39% (241/122)	Futures W/L	45.50% (96/115)
56% (426/756)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	45% (106/235)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
53% (147/275)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (19/37)
56% (130/233)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (27/48)
85% (424/362)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (112/97)
14% (424/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (112/15)
21% (350/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (131/10)