Cem Ilkel vs Francois-Arthur Vibert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Vibert analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Francois-Arthur Vibert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.74% of points on his second serve, while Vibert has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vibert has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vibert has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Vibert winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Vibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 183/ 211), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 7/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Vibert has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Vibert winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Vibert was at the Turkey F45 (Antalya), 01-12-2017, Quarterfinals, Clay with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Vibert have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Vibert 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Vibert 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.83 while Vibert has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vibert has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 44.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vibert has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Vibert
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
618
High
33
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (400-309)
Career Total W/L
44% (221-283)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Francois-Arthur Vibert |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (25/44) | 53% (31/59) |
1st Serve Win% | 84% (21/25) | 58% (18/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 32% (9/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 54% (32/59) | 32% (14/44) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Francois-Arthur Vibert |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (17/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (165/195) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
Aces Total | 94 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:14 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 162.39 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (616/1073) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (442/616) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (210/457) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (32/74) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (378/1044) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Francois-Arthur Vibert Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Simon Beaupain
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
73%
(
72 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Remy Bertola
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Francois-Arthur Vibert
Player
Luca Giacomini
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
80)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francois-Arthur Vibert
Player
Gregorio Cordonnier
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Albert Roglan
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maciej Rajski
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
15
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bruno Sant'Anna
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more