Cem Ilkel vs Enzo Couacaud Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Couacaud analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Enzo Couacaud Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.74% of points on his second serve, while Couacaud has won 48.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Couacaud has won 47.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 35.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Couacaud has saved 61.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Couacaud winning 58.7% (W/L 27/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Couacaud has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 185/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 50/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Couacaud has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 20/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 3 and Couacaud winning 2. The last match between Ilkel and Couacaud was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 11-01-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Enzo Couacaud getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Couacaud have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Couacaud 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 2, and Couacaud 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.83 while Couacaud has played against players with an average rank of 229.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Couacaud has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 44.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Couacaud has converted 40.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 1 Couacaud
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
196
Rank
151
High
29
Age
R
Plays
15
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Form
56% (400-309)
Career Total W/L
61% (342-216)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
71% (15-6)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$698,440
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Enzo Couacaud |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
Games Won | 27 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 18 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:43 | 1:55:43 |
1st Serve % | 57% (96/168) | 58% (100/171) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (75/96) | 66% (66/100) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (32/72) | 59% (42/71) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 43% (6/14) |
Return Points W% | 37% (63/171) | 36% (61/168) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
104)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
6-2 7-6(4) |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Enzo Couacaud
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Enzo Couacaud |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 71% (15/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (17/23) | 63% (33/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (165/195) | 53% (259/229) |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 60% (6/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 82% (9/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.6 |
Aces Total | 94 | 143 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 42 | 70 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:14 | 1:44:20 |
Avg Opp Rank | 162.39 | 242.81 |
1st Serve % | 57% (616/1073) | 58% (864/1501) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (442/616) | 77% (662/864) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (210/457) | 48% (308/637) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (32/74) | 41% (62/153) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (378/1044) | 40% (654/1629) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 75% (15/5) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 70% (14/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 75% (6/8) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 67% (6/9) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 44% (9/4) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Enzo Couacaud Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
SF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gianluca Mager
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Enzo Couacaud
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
14
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Andrea Collarini
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
94)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Emilio Gomez
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more