Celine Naef vs Raquel Gonzalez Vilar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naef vs Vilar analysis and find out who is favored!
Celine Naef vs Raquel Gonzalez Vilar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 47.41% of points on his second serve, while Vilar has won 42.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 54.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vilar has won 62.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.88% and 41.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 56.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vilar has saved 68.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 60.94% of matches played (W/L 39/ 25), with Vilar winning 55.56% (W/L 10/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 43/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 20/ 13). Vilar has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15), where as Vilar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.19 while Vilar has played against players with an average rank of 38.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vilar has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 43.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vilar has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Naef 0 - 0 Vilar
6
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
147
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
69% (84-37)
Career Total W/L
44% (20-25)
64% (14-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$169,770
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Celine Naef | Raquel Gonzalez Vilar |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 64% (14/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (33/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (263/194) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.37 | 0 |
Aces Total | 82 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:34 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 178.82 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (909/1500) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (628/909) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (285/591) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (90/215) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (710/1538) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Celine Naef
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Celine Naef
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Celine Naef
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
86%
(
30 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Celine Naef
Player
Tereza Martincova
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Celine Naef
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Harmony Tan
Player
Celine Naef
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Gina Marie Dittmann
Player
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
Player
Carolina Gomez
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
40%
(
22 of
55)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
Player
Denise Torrealba
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
82%
(
32 of
39)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 7-5 12-10 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kolie Allen
Player
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
57%
(
72 of
126)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
23 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
59 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Amandine Monnot
Player
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raquel Gonzalez Vilar
Player
Florentine Dekkers
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more