Celine Naef vs Elena Pridankina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Mar at 07:15 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Naef vs E. Pridankina

SUI
0
Win
Played
2
Win

RUS
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Naef 0 - 2 Pridankina
They have played 5 sets in total, with Celine Naef winning 1 and Elena Pridankina winning 4. The last match between Elena Pridankina and Celine Naef was at the W75 Trnava, 01-03-2025, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Elena Pridankina getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Naef | 0 |
Pridankina | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) W75 Trnava(03-01-25)
(R1) W75 Maribor(03-19-24)
C. Naef vs E. Pridankina H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$220,512 | Career Prize Money | $77,130 |
63.00% (126-74) | Career Total W/L | 68.10% (158-74) |
0 | Indoor | 2 |
7 | Titles | 6 |
0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
C. Naef vs E. Pridankina Match Preview:
When it comes to second serve performance, Naef is firing up quite a storm, winning 41.92% of points in their recent encounters. Meanwhile, Pridankina seems to occasionally drop the second serve ball, scoring 36.12%. And just like predicting the outcome of the spaghetti-eating contest, this stat closely relates to match-forecasting accuracy.
Ah, but let's return to the return game stats! Recently, Naef's been quick on their feet, snatching 46% of their rival's second serve points. However, Pridankina, with their quick wit and reflexes, claims victory here with 51.87%. But wait, there's more! When it comes to first serve returns, Naef is ahead by a hair at 30.4% while Pridankina edges them out with 31.33%. Clearly, deciding who's the favorite in this head-to-head duel involves a delicate dance of stats interpretation.
If you ever find yourself under pressure (or in an intense tennis match), saving breakpoints becomes your superpower. Naef, with their cape fluttering in the tennis wind, saves breakpoints 45.56% of the time. Pridankina, not far behind, pulls off a heroic 43.68% save rate. Surely, these numbers are pivotal for those in-game betting strategists plotting their victory plans.
Broadening our view, Naef has clinched 59.38% of their matches over the past year, gallantly sporting a win/loss record of 38/26. Not to be outdone, Pridankina boasts a 62.69% win rate, standing tall with a 42/25 tally. In the world of head-to-head predictions, these stats sketch an intriguing picture.
Diving into surface specialization, Naef has a love affair with indoor hard courts, boasting a 74% win rate. However, the grass courts conspire against them as they settle with 50%. In contrast, Pridankina thrives on indoor hard courts with a 75% success rate while their Achilles' heel lies on hard courts with a mere 68% victory percentage.
Looking at player level, Naef has spent most of their year charming audiences at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, waltzing away with a 66.67% victory rate. Pridankina, performing the same dance in the same venue, clocks in a respectable 66.1%. It's as if the tournaments whisper sweet encouragement to each of them equally.
Head-to-head bouts reveal a victorious Pridankina, with Naef unable to break their 0-game winning streak against them. Oh, how the tides can shift! Of the three sets played, Naef twirled away with one, while Pridankina secured two. Their last duel saw Pridankina delightedly emerging triumphant in a nail-biting three-set encounter.
In high-stakes moments, they've ventured into deciding sets once, with Naef observing from the sidelines as Pridankina danced away with the victory. They faced off in only one tiebreak, where Lady Luck favored Pridankina. When it comes to their foes, Naef faced off against players with an average rank of 210.42, giving them a touch of the elite experience. Pridankina, perhaps challenging themselves a bit less, faced players with an average rank of 305.13.
Considering their deciding set escapades over the last year, Naef shines with a sparkling 63% success rate, while Pridankina follows behind at a more modest 48%. If the match dashes to a deciding set showdown, these stats might just guide the prophetic pundit. In the heat of breakpoint conversion, Naef disappoints only 62.31% of the time, with Pridankina squandering a slightly warmer 66.67% of chances to disrupt their opponent’s serve.
To wrap it all up with a flourish, based on an intricate ballet of stats and a sprinkle of humor, Pridankina looks likely to hold the upper hand in this impending face-off on the tennis court.
Celine Naef vs Elena Pridankina Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Naef vs E. Pridankina H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
1 | Sets Won | 4 |
21 | Games Won | 26 |
8 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
12 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
2:5:12 | Average Match Time | 2:5:12 |
58% (98/168) | 1st Serve % | 66% (105/159) |
63% (62/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (68/105) |
46% (32/70) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (27/54) |
33% (6/18) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (8/22) |
40% (64/159) | Return Points Win % | 44% (74/168) |
0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Naef Recent Matches Played
E. Pridankina Recent Matches Played

C. Naef vs E. Pridankina Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63.00% (126/74) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.10% (158/74) |
60.00% (282/188) | Sets Win/Loss | 66.09% (343/176) |
54.46% (2350/1965) | Games Win/Loss | 57.49% (2667/1972) |
55.17% (16/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.04% (70/36) |
50.98% (26/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.77% (60/26) |
72.45% (71/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.79% (28/11) |
59.09% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
596 | Aces Total | 372 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
466 | Total Double Faults | 699 |
1:36:52 | Average Match Time | 1:34:2 |
314.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.41 |
60% (8234/13823) | 1st Serve % | 65% (9225/14217) |
64% (5299/8234) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (5904/9225) |
49% (2719/5589) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2286/4991) |
50% (858/1720) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1029/2047) |
46% (6315/13799) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7090/14603) |
42.11% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
37.50% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
66.45% (101/51) | Challenger W/L | 67.24% (117/57) |
86.67% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 81.40% (35/8) |
63% (126/199) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (154/226) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
53% (21/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (23/42) |
58% (40/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (30/61) |
86% (118/102) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (161/143) |
14% (118/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (161/18) |
29% (82/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (71/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
