Celine Naef vs Caty McNally Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Naef vs C. McNally

Celine Naef
SUI
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
23
-
Height
-
266
C. Rank
81
121
Best Rank
54
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$220.5K
Career Money
$1.3M
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Caty McNally
USA
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
23
-
Height
-
266
C. Rank
81
121
Best Rank
54
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$220.5K
Career Money
$1.3M
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Naef 1 - 0 McNally
They have played 3 sets in total, with Celine Naef winning 2 and Caty McNally winning 1. The last match between Celine Naef and Caty McNally was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 15-06-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Celine Naef getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naef | 1 |
| McNally | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch(06-15-23)
Celine Naef
3
6
6
Caty McNally
6
4
3
C. Naef vs C. McNally H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $220,512 | Career Prize Money | $1,334,271 |
| 62.38% (126-76) | Career Total W/L | 60.24% (197-130) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.62% (10-11) |
C. Naef vs C. McNally Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Celine Naef has won 42.04% of points on their second serve, while Caty McNally has won 37.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Celine Naef, in recent form, has won 47.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Caty McNally has won 47.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.73% and 33.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Celine Naef has saved 54.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Caty McNally has saved 43.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Celine Naef has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 21/21), with Caty McNally winning 70.83% (W/L 51/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Celine Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 70/27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/25). Caty McNally has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 37/15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 85/69).
- Player level: In the last year, Celine Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/16), where as Caty McNally has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 83.72% of matches (W/L 36/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Celine Naef winning 1 times and Caty McNally being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Celine Naef winning 2 and Caty McNally winning 1.
- The last match between Celine Naef and Caty McNally was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 15-06-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Celine Naef getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:15.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Celine Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.88 while Caty McNally has played against players with an average rank of 194.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Celine Naef has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Caty McNally has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Celine Naef has converted 41.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Caty McNally has converted 40.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Celine Naef vs Caty McNally Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Naef vs C. McNally H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:4:15 | Average Match Time | 2:4:15 |
| 71% (53/75) | 1st Serve % | 69% (72/104) |
| 66% (35/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (43/72) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (11/32) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 48% (50/104) | Return Points Win % | 40% (30/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Naef 47%, McNally 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Naef 52%, McNally 60%.
Break Points Saved %: Naef 58%, McNally 56%.
C. Naef Recent Matches Played
C. McNally Recent Matches Played

C. Naef vs C. McNally Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.38% (126/76) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.24% (197/130) |
| 59.49% (282/192) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.40% (438/312) |
| 54.30% (2363/1989) | Games Win/Loss | 53.72% (3649/3143) |
| 53.33% (16/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.19% (85/69) |
| 50.98% (26/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.97% (46/32) |
| 71.72% (71/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.15% (37/15) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 67.44% (29/14) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 598 | Aces Total | 601 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 475 | Total Double Faults | 1315 |
| 1:36:45 | Average Match Time | 1:32:18 |
| 321.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 332.65 |
| 60% (8306/13952) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13438/20584) |
| 64% (5336/8306) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8464/13438) |
| 49% (2740/5646) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3165/7146) |
| 50% (864/1737) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1311/2624) |
| 46% (6360/13911) | Return Points Win % | 46% (9673/20831) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (12/18) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 52.75% (48/43) |
| 65.58% (101/53) | Challenger W/L | 70.34% (102/43) |
| 86.67% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 69.57% (16/7) |
| 63% (126/201) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (194/322) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (21/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (28/57) |
| 58% (40/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (54/101) |
| 86% (118/102) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (202/171) |
| 14% (118/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (202/31) |
| 29% (84/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (125/25) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:30 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
4.15
W2
1.189
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.42
W2
2.61
08:00 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.2
W2
1.58
12:30 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.75
W2
1.952
05:05 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
5.55
W2
1.107
01:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
3.8
W2
1.22
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
13 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Lorenzo Musetti Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Vit Kopriva Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 13, 2025
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 6-3
16:00
H2H 7-1
04:30
H2H 0-0
07:30
H2H 0-0
08:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal