Cedric Stanke vs Michael Bassem Sobhy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Stanke vs M. Bassem Sobhy

Cedric Stanke

GER

1

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

736

Best Rank

706

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Michael Bassem Sobhy

EGY

1

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

C. Rank

736

Best Rank

706

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Stanke 1 - 3 Sobhy

They have played 9 sets in total, with Cedric Stanke winning 3 and Michael Bassem Sobhy winning 6. The last match between Michael Bassem Sobhy and Cedric Stanke was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 02-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Michael Bassem Sobhy getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Stanke	1
Sobhy	3

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R1) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(04-02-25)

Stats

Michael Bassem Sobhy

Cedric Stanke

(R1) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(11-29-23)

Stats

Michael Bassem Sobhy

Cedric Stanke

(Q3) M25 Sharm ElSheikh(10-31-23)

Stats

Cedric Stanke

Michael Bassem Sobhy

C. Stanke vs M. B. Sobhy H2H Profile

C. Stanke	Stats	M. B. Sobhy
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.24% (104-103)	Career Total W/L	44.86% (96-118)
1	Hard	3
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Stanke vs M. B. Sobhy Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cedric Stanke has won 41.64% of points on their second serve, while Michael Bassem Sobhy has won 44.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cedric Stanke, in recent form, has won 41.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michael Bassem Sobhy has won 42.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.67% and 26.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cedric Stanke has saved 56.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michael Bassem Sobhy has saved 49.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cedric Stanke has won 56.86% of matches played (W/L 29/22), with Michael Bassem Sobhy winning 52.94% (W/L 27/24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cedric Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 59/43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 44/58). Michael Bassem Sobhy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 74/80), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Cedric Stanke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/22), where as Michael Bassem Sobhy has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Cedric Stanke winning 1 times and Michael Bassem Sobhy being victorious 3 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Cedric Stanke winning 3 and Michael Bassem Sobhy winning 6.
The last match between Cedric Stanke and Michael Bassem Sobhy was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 02-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Michael Bassem Sobhy getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:58.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cedric Stanke has played against opponents with an average rank of 39.16 while Michael Bassem Sobhy has played against players with an average rank of 385.29.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cedric Stanke has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michael Bassem Sobhy has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cedric Stanke has converted 40.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michael Bassem Sobhy has converted 33.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cedric Stanke vs Michael Bassem Sobhy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Stanke vs M. B. Sobhy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Stanke	Stats	M. B. Sobhy
1	H2H Matches Won	3
3	Sets Won	6
38	Games Won	52
13	Aces (Total)	8
10	Total Double Faults	5
1:33:58	Average Match Time	1:33:58
66% (161/243)	1st Serve %	62% (147/236)
69% (111/161)	1st Serve Win %	70% (103/147)
39% (32/82)	2nd Serve Win %	58% (52/89)
47% (7/15)	Break Pts Won %	38% (11/29)
34% (81/236)	Return Points Win %	41% (100/243)
25% (1/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	75% (3/4)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (3/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Stanke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Sharm ElSheikh - 01-12-2025
R2 Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Konstantinos LoukopoulosK. Loukopoulos	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Q3 Noah MartensN. Martens	W	7-6(5) 4-6 10-8	Stats
Q2 James BeavenJ. Beaven	W	6-4 4-0 ret.	Stats
Q1 Sebastian PaulovcakS. Paulovcak	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

M. B. Sobhy Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Sharm ElSheikh - 01-12-2025
R2 Aleksandr BrayninA. Braynin	W	5-7 6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Fryderyk Lechno-WasiutynskiF. Lechno-Wasiutynski	W	7-6(9) 7-6(7)	Stats
Manama 2 Challenger - 24-11-2025
Q1 Maximilian HombergM. Homberg	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Soma Bay Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Alexandr BindaA. Binda	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R1 Mirza BasicM. Basic	W	6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6)	Stats

View All

C. Stanke vs M. B. Sobhy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Stanke	Stats	M. B. Sobhy
50.24% (104/103)	YTD Win/Loss	44.86% (96/118)
50.00% (232/232)	Sets Win/Loss	46.46% (223/257)
49.92% (2315/2322)	Games Win/Loss	49.52% (2202/2245)
57.84% (59/43)	Hard Win/Loss	48.05% (74/80)
43.14% (44/58)	Clay Win/Loss	37.29% (22/37)
33.33% (1/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.12	Aces Per Game	0.18
268	Aces Total	400
0.1	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
217	Total Double Faults	336
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:6:49
150.52	Average Opponent Rank	348.77
64% (3349/5271)	1st Serve %	56% (5328/9448)
66% (2196/3349)	1st Serve Win %	66% (3533/5328)
47% (899/1922)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (2028/4123)
44% (190/428)	Break Points Won % (Total)	44% (399/914)
38% (1978/5172)	Return Points Win %	40% (3720/9384)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	25.00% (1/3)
50.24% (104/103)	Futures W/L	45.67% (95/113)
50% (103/206)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	44% (91/205)
51% (20/39)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (23/43)
51% (26/51)	Deciding Set Win %	41% (25/61)
88% (106/93)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (102/84)
12% (106/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (102/18)
11% (101/11)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (112/12)