Prediction of Cary Stansbury vs Tomm Warneke Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Stansbury vs T. Warneke

Cary Stansbury

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

220

Best Rank

159

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tomm Warneke

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

220

Best Rank

159

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Stansbury 1 - 0 Warneke

They have played 3 sets in total, with Cary Stansbury winning 2 and Tomm Warneke winning 1. The last match between Cary Stansbury and Tomm Warneke was at the Schenectady CH, 01-07-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Cary Stansbury getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Stansbury	1
Warneke	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Schenectady CH(07-01-85)

Stats

Cary Stansbury

Tomm Warneke

C. Stansbury vs T. Warneke H2H Profile

C. Stansbury	Stats	T. Warneke
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
38.68% (41-65)	Career Total W/L	34.29% (12-23)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Stansbury vs T. Warneke Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cary Stansbury has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tomm Warneke has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cary Stansbury, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tomm Warneke has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cary Stansbury has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tomm Warneke has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cary Stansbury has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tomm Warneke winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cary Stansbury has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 26/34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/6). Tomm Warneke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 7/9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Cary Stansbury has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tomm Warneke has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cary Stansbury winning 1 times and Tomm Warneke being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cary Stansbury winning 2 and Tomm Warneke winning 1.
The last match between Cary Stansbury and Tomm Warneke was at the Schenectady CH, 01-07-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Cary Stansbury getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cary Stansbury has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tomm Warneke has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cary Stansbury has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tomm Warneke has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cary Stansbury has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tomm Warneke has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cary Stansbury vs Tomm Warneke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Stansbury vs T. Warneke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Stansbury	Stats	T. Warneke
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
14	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Stansbury Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Las Vegas CH - 12-10-1987
R3 Glenn LayendeckerG. Layendecker	L	4-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
Vancouver CH - 05-10-1987
R3 Alexander MronzA. Mronz	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Coquitlam CH - 28-09-1987
R3 Juan RiosJ. Rios	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
New Haven CH - 10-08-1987
R3 Joey RiveJ. Rive	L	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Guadeloupe CH - 13-04-1987
R4 Mike BauerM. Bauer	L	6-4 6-7 7-6	Stats

View All

T. Warneke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
New Haven CH - 10-08-1987
R3 Todd NelsonT. Nelson	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Washington - 27-07-1987
R2 Stephane BonneauS. Bonneau	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Forest Hills - 04-05-1987
R2 Ricardo AcunaR. Acuna	W	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
R3 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Stockholm - 03-11-1986
R2 Richard MatuszewskiR. Matuszewski	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Stansbury vs T. Warneke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Stansbury	Stats	T. Warneke
38.68% (41/65)	YTD Win/Loss	34.29% (12/23)
41.39% (101/143)	Sets Win/Loss	37.04% (30/51)
46.93% (1085/1227)	Games Win/Loss	46.45% (366/422)
43.33% (26/34)	Hard Win/Loss	30.77% (4/9)
38.89% (14/22)	Clay Win/Loss	43.75% (7/9)
25.00% (1/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	20.00% (1/4)
0.00% (0/6)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
572.04	Average Opponent Rank	461.43
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	33.33% (1/2)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	50.00% (1/1)
25.00% (7/21)	Main Tour W/L	22.22% (4/14)
44.16% (34/43)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (6/6)
40% (41/103)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (11/32)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (1/3)
42% (14/33)	Deciding Set Win %	40% (2/5)
80% (41/33)	1st Set Won, Won Match	77% (13/10)
20% (41/8)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	23% (13/3)
12% (65/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (22/2)