Carrie-Anne Hoo vs Bella Payne Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 06:13 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Hoo vs B. Payne

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Hoo 0 - 1 Payne
They have played 3 sets in total, with Carrie-Anne Hoo winning 1 and Bella Payne winning 2. The last match between Bella Payne and Carrie-Anne Hoo was at the W15 Clemson, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Bella Payne getting the victory 6-0 5-7 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hoo | 0 |
| Payne | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Clemson(11-12-25)
C. Hoo vs B. Payne H2H Profile
C. Hoo vs B. Payne Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Carrie-Anne Hoo has struggled with her second serve, winning 0% of points, whereas Bella Payne has a significantly better rate at 45.19%. How critical is the second serve in predicting match outcomes? Bella's superior performance in this area likely suggests an advantage.
- Return Game: Carrie-Anne Hoo's return stats show a concerning 0% success on both first and second serve returns of her opponents. Bella Payne, on the other hand, has a strong 51.47% on second serve and 37.07% on first serve returns, indicating a clear superiority in breaking her opponents.
- Pressure Performance: When it comes to saving breakpoints, Carrie-Anne hasn't saved any, while Bella maintains a solid 51.23% success rate. Is this an indicator of mental fortitude? Bella's performance under pressure suggests she handles stress well.
- Overall Match Wins: In the past year, Carrie-Anne has failed to secure any match wins, while Bella has won 46.15% of her matches. This stark contrast favors Bella considerably in overall performance.
- Surface Proficiency: Bella Payne excels on clay with a win rate of 53.85%, but struggles more on hard courts. In comparison, there's no available baseline data on Carrie's surface preferences due to insufficient match records.
- Player Level and Experience: Carrie-Anne has not played any recorded matches recently in competitive circuits, while Bella has a moderate experience level, participating mostly in Futures/ITF circuits, with a 40% win rate.
- Opponent Quality: Bella has competed against players ranked on average at 288.5, providing her with better competition exposure, unlike Carrie-Anne with no recorded matches or opponent ranking data.
- Deciding Set Performance: Bella Payne has demonstrated resilience by winning 63% of deciding sets, whereas Carrie-Anne hasn't managed to win any, highlighting Bella's superior ability in clutch situations.
- Break Point Conversion: Bella's 39.32% success in converting breakpoint opportunities signifies her adeptness at capitalizing on crucial moments, a stark contrast to Carrie-Anne’s lack of conversion.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing the upcoming match between Carrie-Anne Hoo and Bella Payne, several critical factors stand out. Bella Payne's compelling performance data over the past year showcases her as a more proficient player.
Bella’s remarkable ability to win the second serve points and effectively return serves plays a pivotal role in her game. Her compelling breakpoint conversion rate further contributes to her potential edge in this match.
In contrast, Carrie-Anne has struggled in numerous aspects, notably failing to win recent matches or convert key points. These elements combined place a considerable advantage towards Bella Payne.
With Bella Payne's current form and past performance analyses, she emerges as the likely victor in this upcoming match against Carrie-Anne Hoo.
Carrie-Anne Hoo vs Bella Payne Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Hoo vs B. Payne H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:49:0 | Average Match Time | 2:49:0 |
| 70% (47/67) | 1st Serve % | 66% (59/89) |
| 60% (28/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (34/59) |
| 10% (2/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (20/30) |
| 21% (3/14) | Break Pts Won % | 58% (7/12) |
| 39% (35/89) | Return Points Win % | 55% (37/67) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Hoo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-0 5-7 6-1 | ||
B. Payne Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 5-7 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 7-6(3) | ||

C. Hoo vs B. Payne Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.00% (0/1) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.72% (35/34) |
| 32.00% (8/17) | Games Win/Loss | 52.40% (327/297) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 18 |
| 0.5 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 41 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:16:5 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 307.6 |
| 70% (47/67) | 1st Serve % | 69% (976/1418) |
| 60% (28/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (538/976) |
| 10% (2/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (223/442) |
| 21% (3/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (83/179) |
| 39% (35/89) | Return Points Win % | 46% (655/1428) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Futures W/L | 52.63% (10/9) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (7/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (17/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (17/3) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (13/2) |