Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caroline Garcia vs Naomi Osaka Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Osaka analysis and find out who is favored!
Caroline Garcia vs Naomi Osaka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 48.32% of points on his second serve, while Osaka has won 51.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 49.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Osaka has won 52.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.14% and 30.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 55.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Osaka has saved 61.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Osaka winning 52.94% (W/L 9/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 51/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 221/ 183). Osaka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 203/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 15/ 11), where as Osaka has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Garcia winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Garcia winning 4 and Osaka winning 4. The last match between Garcia and Osaka was at the Miami Open - Miami, 24-03-2024, Third, Hard with Caroline Garcia getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia and Osaka have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garcia winning 0 times and Osaka 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia winning 2, and Osaka 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 93.43 while Osaka has played against players with an average rank of 65.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Osaka has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 40.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Osaka has converted 36.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Garcia 2 - 2 Osaka
24
Rank
4
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
2
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
197
Rank
1
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (455-346)
Career Total W/L
64% (293-163)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$10,031,096
Career Prize Money
$21,281,680
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 41 | 46 |
| Aces (Total) | 35 | 43 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:53 | 1:25:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (155/251) | 54% (147/271) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (111/155) | 79% (116/147) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (56/96) | 58% (72/124) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (4/20) | 50% (7/14) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (83/271) | 33% (84/251) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats 
Caroline Garcia
Player
Naomi Osaka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Naomi Osaka
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
13
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Naomi Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (31/29) | 56% (20/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (282/278) | 52% (196/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.63 | 0.77 |
| Aces Total | 171 | 142 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:37 | 1:37:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.25 | 65.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1044/1751) | 54% (643/1185) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (743/1044) | 75% (485/643) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (343/707) | 51% (278/542) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (66/168) | 36% (43/118) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (682/1802) | 38% (465/1216) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 64% (7/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 53% (9/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (7/0) |
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Xinyu Wang
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Caroline Garcia
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Caroline Garcia
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
9
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Caroline Garcia
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Cori Gauff
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Naomi Osaka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Naomi Osaka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Naomi Osaka
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Greetje Minnen
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Naomi Osaka
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Yulia Putintseva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
15
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Naomi Osaka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Elina Svitolina
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
79%
(
23 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Naomi Osaka
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
38%
(
29 of
76)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Sara Errani
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
82%
(
47 of
57)
9
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia Vs Osaka Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
