Prediction of Caroline Bodart vs Pamela Zingman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Bodart vs P. Zingman

Caroline Bodart

BEL

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

384

Best Rank

361

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Pamela Zingman

ARG

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

384

Best Rank

361

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Bodart 1 - 1 Zingman

They have played 5 sets in total, with Caroline Bodart winning 3 and Pamela Zingman winning 2. The last match between Caroline Bodart and Pamela Zingman was at the ITF Buenos Aires 1, 07-11-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Caroline Bodart getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bodart	1
Zingman	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF Buenos Aires 1(11-07-94)

Stats

Caroline Bodart

Pamela Zingman

(R3) ITF Balaguer(05-02-94)

Stats

Pamela Zingman

Caroline Bodart

C. Bodart vs P. Zingman H2H Profile

C. Bodart	Stats	P. Zingman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.87% (46-41)	Career Total W/L	54.40% (68-57)
1	Clay	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Bodart vs P. Zingman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caroline Bodart has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pamela Zingman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caroline Bodart, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pamela Zingman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Caroline Bodart has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pamela Zingman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Caroline Bodart has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pamela Zingman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Caroline Bodart has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 21/22). Pamela Zingman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 11/9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 57/48).
Player level: In the last year, Caroline Bodart has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pamela Zingman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Caroline Bodart winning 1 times and Pamela Zingman being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Caroline Bodart winning 3 and Pamela Zingman winning 2.
The last match between Caroline Bodart and Pamela Zingman was at the ITF Buenos Aires 1, 07-11-1994, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Caroline Bodart getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caroline Bodart has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pamela Zingman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caroline Bodart has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pamela Zingman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Caroline Bodart has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pamela Zingman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Caroline Bodart vs Pamela Zingman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Bodart vs P. Zingman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Bodart	Stats	P. Zingman
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
25	Games Won	18
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Bodart Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Heerhugowaard 10K - 01-07-1996
R3 Floor VioenF. Vioen	L	1-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
Velp 10K - 24-06-1996
R4 Daphne Van De ZandeD. Van	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R3 Karina KarnerK. Karner	W	7-5 2-6 6-4	Stats
Klosters 10K - 17-06-1996
R3 Kylie MouldsK. Moulds	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Le Touquet 10K - 06-05-1996
R4 Germana Di NataleG. Di	L	6-3 6-0	Stats

View All

P. Zingman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Buenos Aires 10K - 09-09-1996
R4 Maria Victoria BeorteguiM. Victoria	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
R3 Laura RossiL. Rossi	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Geraldine AizenbergG. Aizenberg	L	1-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
Buenos Aires 25K - 22-07-1996
R3 Caroline SchneiderC. Schneider	L	6-4 2-6 6-4	Stats
Buenos Aires 10K - 27-05-1996
R4 Mariela BrunelloM. Brunello	W	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Bodart vs P. Zingman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Bodart	Stats	P. Zingman
52.87% (46/41)	YTD Win/Loss	54.40% (68/57)
52.02% (103/95)	Sets Win/Loss	53.74% (158/136)
51.63% (901/844)	Games Win/Loss	51.41% (1328/1255)
60.00% (18/12)	Hard Win/Loss	55.00% (11/9)
48.84% (21/22)	Clay Win/Loss	54.29% (57/48)
50.00% (7/7)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
576.51	Average Opponent Rank	519.26
57.97% (40/29)	Challenger W/L	54.46% (55/46)
53% (46/86)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (67/124)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
57% (4/7)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (6/12)
57% (13/23)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (22/45)
82% (44/36)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (66/55)
18% (44/8)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (66/11)
23% (43/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (59/13)