Carolina Kuhl vs Monika Ekstrand Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 04:05 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kuhl vs M. Ekstrand

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kuhl 1 - 0 Ekstrand
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carolina Kuhl winning 2 and Monika Ekstrand winning 0. The last match between Carolina Kuhl and Monika Ekstrand was at the W35 San Rafael, 30-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Carolina Kuhl getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuhl | 1 |
| Ekstrand | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 San Rafael(09-30-25)
C. Kuhl vs M. Ekstrand H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.29% (95-80) | Career Total W/L | 56.52% (39-30) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kuhl vs M. Ekstrand Match Preview:
- In recent form, Monika Ekstrand has won 42.84% of points on her second serve, outperforming Carolina Kuhl, who has won 39.90%. Could this better second serve performance be an edge?
- Carolina Kuhl edges ahead slightly in return games, winning 52.72% of opponents' second serve points compared to Ekstrand's 52.11%. Both players have similar strengths in first serve returns.
- Under pressure, Kuhl shows resilience by saving 51.20% of breakpoints, surpassing Ekstrand's 47.92%, which could prove decisive in critical situations.
- Over the last year, Ekstrand has a superior match win percentage at 68.00% contrasted with Kuhl's 39.53%, indicating a more consistent performance.
- Both players excel on different surfaces. Kuhl's best is Hard with a 60% win rate, while Ekstrand's best is Clay, also at 60%, potentially influencing strategy.
- Ekstrand has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (372.3) compared to Kuhl's 436.3, possibly suggesting greater experience against tougher competition.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Ekstrand's impressive 73% win rate in such scenarios may be a decisive factor compared to Kuhl's 33%.
- In tournament play over the past year, Ekstrand has a more impressive record in Challenger/ITF events, winning 67.57% of matches, compared to Kuhl's 40.54%.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the recent performance patterns, Monika Ekstrand appears to have an advantage in overall match win percentage, suggesting greater consistency over the year.
Carolina Kuhl demonstrates notable strength in breaking opponents' serves and resilience under pressure, but Ekstrand excels in converting tight matches into victories, particularly in deciding sets.
While Kuhl has a marginally superior breakpoint save percentage, Ekstrand's experience against higher-ranked opponents and better second serve performance could be significant in determining the outcome.
As we weigh these factors, Monika Ekstrand emerges as the likely winner of this upcoming match, showcasing a well-rounded game and an edge in handling critical moments.
Carolina Kuhl vs Monika Ekstrand Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kuhl vs M. Ekstrand H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:29:10 | Average Match Time | 2:29:10 |
| 70% (51/73) | 1st Serve % | 70% (54/77) |
| 61% (31/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (34/54) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 47% (36/77) | Return Points Win % | 42% (31/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Kuhl Recent Matches Played
M. Ekstrand Recent Matches Played

C. Kuhl vs M. Ekstrand Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.29% (95/80) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (39/30) |
| 53.48% (215/187) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.73% (87/78) |
| 51.60% (1856/1741) | Games Win/Loss | 51.42% (798/754) |
| 60.71% (17/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.29% (19/16) |
| 55.45% (56/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.29% (19/12) |
| 47.83% (22/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 291 | Aces Total | 131 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 502 | Total Double Faults | 255 |
| 1:46:33 | Average Match Time | 1:34:7 |
| 466.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.77 |
| 62% (7201/11537) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2373/3980) |
| 60% (4318/7201) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1484/2373) |
| 46% (1973/4336) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (735/1607) |
| 49% (738/1496) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (223/467) |
| 47% (5443/11560) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1835/4063) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.76% (59/62) | Challenger W/L | 53.70% (29/25) |
| 67.92% (36/17) | Futures W/L | 71.43% (10/4) |
| 54% (94/173) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (38/68) |
| 57% (16/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (7/12) |
| 52% (28/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (18/28) |
| 83% (95/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (35/29) |
| 17% (95/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (35/6) |
| 20% (80/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (34/10) |