Carolina Kuhl vs Doga Turkmen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kuhl vs D. Turkmen

Carolina Kuhl
GER
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
23
-
Height
-
538
C. Rank
0
391
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Doga Turkmen
TUR
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
23
-
Height
-
538
C. Rank
0
391
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kuhl 1 - 0 Turkmen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carolina Kuhl winning 2 and Doga Turkmen winning 0. The last match between Carolina Kuhl and Doga Turkmen was at the W15 Kottingbrunn, 03-08-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Carolina Kuhl getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuhl | 1 |
| Turkmen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Kottingbrunn(08-03-22)
Carolina Kuhl
6
6
Doga Turkmen
3
4
C. Kuhl vs D. Turkmen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.24% (96-81) | Career Total W/L | 38.79% (109-172) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kuhl vs D. Turkmen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carolina Kuhl has won 40.14% of points on their second serve, while Doga Turkmen has won 42.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carolina Kuhl, in recent form, has won 51.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Doga Turkmen has won 48.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.17% and 40.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carolina Kuhl has saved 51.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Doga Turkmen has saved 51.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carolina Kuhl has won 42.55% of matches played (W/L 20/27), with Doga Turkmen winning 50.00% (W/L 13/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carolina Kuhl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 17/11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 49% (W/L 18/19). Doga Turkmen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 26/39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Carolina Kuhl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.90% of matches (W/L 18/23), where as Doga Turkmen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carolina Kuhl winning 1 times and Doga Turkmen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carolina Kuhl winning 2 and Doga Turkmen winning 0.
- The last match between Carolina Kuhl and Doga Turkmen was at the W15 Kottingbrunn, 03-08-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Carolina Kuhl getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carolina Kuhl has played against opponents with an average rank of 469.7 while Doga Turkmen has played against players with an average rank of 402.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carolina Kuhl has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Doga Turkmen has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carolina Kuhl has converted 31.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Doga Turkmen has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Carolina Kuhl vs Doga Turkmen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kuhl vs D. Turkmen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:38:0 | Average Match Time | 1:38:0 |
| 50% (28/56) | 1st Serve % | 49% (37/75) |
| 75% (21/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 47% (35/75) | Return Points Win % | 34% (19/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kuhl 46%, Turkmen 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kuhl 57%, Turkmen 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Kuhl 58%, Turkmen 49%.
C. Kuhl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | ||
D. Turkmen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-6(2) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||

C. Kuhl vs D. Turkmen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.24% (96/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 38.79% (109/172) |
| 53.58% (217/188) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.65% (247/376) |
| 51.60% (1870/1754) | Games Win/Loss | 44.95% (2539/3110) |
| 60.71% (17/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (26/39) |
| 55.34% (57/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.86% (82/129) |
| 47.83% (22/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 293 | Aces Total | 63 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 504 | Total Double Faults | 408 |
| 1:46:1 | Average Match Time | 1:2:4 |
| 470.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 413.39 |
| 62% (7254/11617) | 1st Serve % | 66% (7333/11077) |
| 60% (4351/7254) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (3784/7333) |
| 46% (1987/4363) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1550/3744) |
| 49% (744/1505) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (599/1306) |
| 47% (5484/11642) | Return Points Win % | 44% (4839/11006) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.78% (60/63) | Challenger W/L | 30.00% (9/21) |
| 67.92% (36/17) | Futures W/L | 39.84% (100/151) |
| 55% (95/174) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (107/279) |
| 57% (16/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (19/39) |
| 52% (28/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (32/63) |
| 83% (96/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (105/89) |
| 17% (96/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (105/16) |
| 20% (81/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (176/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction09:10 PM 16/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal