Prediction of Carole Rosser vs Marilyn Greenwood Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Rosser vs M. Greenwood

Carole Rosser

GBR

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Marilyn Greenwood

GBR

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Rosser 3 - 1 Greenwood

They have played 8 sets in total, with Carole Rosser winning 6 and Marilyn Greenwood winning 2. The last match between Carole Rosser and Marilyn Greenwood was at the Bournemouth, 20-04-1964, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Carole Rosser getting the victory 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Rosser	3
Greenwood	1

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R3) Bournemouth(04-20-64)

Stats

Carole Rosser

Marilyn Greenwood

(R3) Hampstead(04-06-64)

Stats

Carole Rosser

Marilyn Greenwood

() Torquay(11-04-63)

Stats

Carole Rosser

Marilyn Greenwood

C. Rosser vs M. Greenwood H2H Profile

C. Rosser	Stats	M. Greenwood
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
59.67% (182-123)	Career Total W/L	35.77% (44-79)
2	Clay	1
1	Indoor	0
3	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Rosser vs M. Greenwood Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carole Rosser has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marilyn Greenwood has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carole Rosser, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marilyn Greenwood has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Carole Rosser has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marilyn Greenwood has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Carole Rosser has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marilyn Greenwood winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Carole Rosser has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 67% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 58/47). Marilyn Greenwood has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 67% (W/L 7/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Carole Rosser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marilyn Greenwood has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Carole Rosser winning 3 times and Marilyn Greenwood being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Carole Rosser winning 6 and Marilyn Greenwood winning 2.
The last match between Carole Rosser and Marilyn Greenwood was at the Bournemouth, 20-04-1964, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Carole Rosser getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carole Rosser has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marilyn Greenwood has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carole Rosser has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marilyn Greenwood has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Carole Rosser has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marilyn Greenwood has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Carole Rosser vs Marilyn Greenwood Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Rosser vs M. Greenwood H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Rosser	Stats	M. Greenwood
3	H2H Matches Won	1
6	Sets Won	2
44	Games Won	35
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
75% (3/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	25% (1/4)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Rosser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Exmouth - 29-08-1966
SF Robin LloydR. Lloyd	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Judy CongdonJ. Congdon	W	W/O	Stats
Budleigh Salterton - 22-08-1966
SF Kathleen HarterK. Harter	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Sue TuttS. Tutt	W	6-2 3-6 6-3	Stats
R4 Dianne BridgerD. Bridger	W	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Greenwood Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Los Angeles - 23-01-1973
Q1 Kathy KuykendallK. Kuykendall	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Tucson - 17-04-1972
Q2 Jill SchwikertJ. Schwikert	L	6-3 2-6 6-4	Stats
Phoenix - 28-09-1971
R3 Nancy RicheyN. Richey	L	W/O	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 20-09-1971
R3 Kerry HarrisK. Harris	L	6-2 6-7 6-3	Stats
Louisville - 14-09-1971
R3 Wendy GilchristW. Gilchrist	L	5-7 6-4 7-6	Stats

View All

C. Rosser vs M. Greenwood Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Rosser	Stats	M. Greenwood
59.67% (182/123)	YTD Win/Loss	35.77% (44/79)
57.76% (387/283)	Sets Win/Loss	39.50% (111/170)
53.02% (3238/2869)	Games Win/Loss	46.18% (1221/1423)
57.14% (8/6)	Hard Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
60.94% (78/50)	Clay Win/Loss	33.33% (17/34)
65.38% (34/18)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (8/12)
55.24% (58/47)	Grass Win/Loss	35.29% (12/22)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
2.04	Average Opponent Rank	5.05
33.33% (5/10)	Slam W/L	40.00% (2/3)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	50.00% (7/7)
59% (175/298)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	37% (43/116)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
49% (35/71)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (19/41)
89% (177/157)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (43/34)
11% (177/19)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (43/9)
15% (123/18)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (76/9)