Carl Bergman vs Taro Daniel Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W W L
Form
L L W W L L W L L LH2H: Bergman 1 - 1 Daniel
They have played 6 sets in total, with Bergman winning 3 and Daniel winning 3. The last match between Bergman and Daniel was at the Turkey F1, 09-01-2012, First, Hard with Carl Bergman getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carl Bergman | 1 |
| Taro Daniel | 1 |
| Bergman | Stats | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (4-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 123 |
| 500 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 37 | Age | 32 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 14 |
| 53% (113-101) | Career Total W/L | 58% (573-421) |
| $2,235 | Career Prize Money | $2,262,594 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-3 | |||||
| 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 32 | Games Won | 27 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carl Bergman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Tobias Kamke
Player
Carl Bergman
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carl Bergman
Player
Tobias Blomgren
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Carl Bergman
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
0
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (113/101) | Win/Loss | 58% (573/421) |
| 54% (264/229) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1316/1033) |
| 52% (2374/2209) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11470/10587) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 51 | Aces Total | 2467 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 40 | Total Double Faults | 1994 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 493.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.85 |
| 63% (607/971) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35491/56755) |
| 64% (389/607) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (24080/35491) |
| 44% (159/364) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10829/21255) |
| 44% (43/98) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2402/5588) |
| 41% (420/1025) | Return Points Win % | 39% (21978/55972) |
| 52% (109/210) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (549/934) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 48% (29/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (162/307) |
| 38% (25/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (148/297) |
| 86% (112/96) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (590/498) |
| 14% (112/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (590/91) |
| 15% (102/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (404/72) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
