Cannon Kingsley vs Logan Zapp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kingsley vs L. Zapp

Cannon Kingsley
USA
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
23
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
542
C. Rank
0
404
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Logan Zapp
USA
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
23
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
542
C. Rank
0
404
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kingsley 1 - 0 Zapp
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cannon Kingsley winning 2 and Logan Zapp winning 0. The last match between Cannon Kingsley and Logan Zapp was at the M15 Pittsburgh, 14-07-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kingsley | 1 |
| Zapp | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Pittsburgh(07-14-22)
Cannon Kingsley
6
6
Logan Zapp
3
4
C. Kingsley vs L. Zapp H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.77% (145-106) | Career Total W/L | 42.50% (17-23) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kingsley vs L. Zapp Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cannon Kingsley has won 47.23% of points on their second serve, while Logan Zapp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cannon Kingsley, in recent form, has won 43.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Logan Zapp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cannon Kingsley has saved 50.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Logan Zapp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cannon Kingsley has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 27/24), with Logan Zapp winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cannon Kingsley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 34/21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 61/51). Logan Zapp has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 10/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 7/13).
- Player level: In the last year, Cannon Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/13), where as Logan Zapp has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cannon Kingsley winning 1 times and Logan Zapp being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cannon Kingsley winning 2 and Logan Zapp winning 0.
- The last match between Cannon Kingsley and Logan Zapp was at the M15 Pittsburgh, 14-07-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cannon Kingsley has played against opponents with an average rank of 417.86 while Logan Zapp has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cannon Kingsley has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Logan Zapp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cannon Kingsley has converted 24.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Logan Zapp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cannon Kingsley vs Logan Zapp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kingsley vs L. Zapp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:43:0 | Average Match Time | 1:43:0 |
| 55% (42/76) | 1st Serve % | 59% (34/58) |
| 74% (31/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 41% (14/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (9/24) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 50% (29/58) | Return Points Win % | 41% (31/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kingsley 50%, Zapp 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kingsley 49%, Zapp 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kingsley 56%, Zapp 0%.
C. Kingsley Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | ||
L. Zapp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 0-6 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 1-6 10-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 4-6 10-4 | ||

C. Kingsley vs L. Zapp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.77% (145/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.50% (17/23) |
| 56.42% (325/251) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.83% (44/48) |
| 53.64% (2939/2540) | Games Win/Loss | 50.33% (464/458) |
| 54.46% (61/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 61.82% (34/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 59.52% (50/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.54 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1443 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 456 | Total Double Faults | 51 |
| 1:32:23 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 425.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.75 |
| 62% (9688/15602) | 1st Serve % | 66% (879/1336) |
| 72% (6964/9688) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (534/879) |
| 52% (3065/5913) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (207/457) |
| 41% (604/1483) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (60/136) |
| 39% (6089/15664) | Return Points Win % | 41% (566/1376) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.49% (49/50) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 64.43% (96/53) | Futures W/L | 43.59% (17/22) |
| 58% (143/248) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 44% (32/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 52% (40/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 17% (2/12) |
| 87% (142/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 76% (21/16) |
| 13% (142/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 24% (21/5) |
| 19% (109/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (19/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
01:50
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece