Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Mitchell Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Mar at 06:18 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ugo Carabelli vs M. Krueger

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Krueger
They have played 3 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 2 and Mitchell Krueger winning 1. The last match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Mitchell Krueger was at the Miami Open - Miami, 17-03-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carabelli | 1 |
| Krueger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Miami Open - Miami(03-17-25)
C. U. Carabelli vs M. Krueger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $639,320 | Career Prize Money | $1,082,108 |
| 62.40% (380-229) | Career Total W/L | 52.57% (450-406) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 43.18% (19-25) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
C. U. Carabelli vs M. Krueger Match Preview:
So, let's chat about the wild world of tennis stats! In our upcoming brawl on the court, we've got Carabelli and Krueger, two titans of the tennis world—at least when they're not accidentally serving balls into the stratosphere.
To start with, Carabelli seems to enjoy living on the edge by converting 34.87% of those ever-elusive breakpoint chances. Meanwhile, Krueger is slightly more opportunistic, cashing in on 37.76% of his attempts to break his opponent's serve. It's like these two are constantly planning a great tennis heist—just trade those racquets for burglar masks, and we've got ourselves a movie!
If you're into second-serve points—who isn't, right?—Carabelli's got a modest 42.28% precision rate over the past half-year. Krueger, on the other hand, edges him out with a 48.13% success rate, which is practically wizardry. That's a credible sign that Krueger might be sneaking up the ladder under our very noses.
Carabelli's propensity to tackle returns makes him a returning threat, capturing 48.76% of his opponent's second-serve points. Krueger hangs back with a respectable 45.55%. When it comes to first-serve returns, Carabelli nails 30.48%, while Krueger has managed to get his magic return wand working only 24.84% of the time. Perhaps Krueger spent too long sipping on his energy drink during returns!
Now, if you've ever wondered how one handles stress on the tennis battlefield, Carabelli has graciously saved 53.02% of breakpoints under what he's deemed pressure. Krueger, perhaps sporting a pair of nerves of steel, edges ahead with 55.1%. These stats may come in handy when placing bets on which player will have sweatier palms as they rally through breakpoints.
Who's got the best win rate on the trusty clay surface, you ask? Well, Carabelli is crushing it with just a tiny smidgen of 65% winning percentage (328/175) and Krueger follows with 56% (115/90). But please, please don't put them on grass unless you want to watch them take a scenic nap on the court—Carabelli has a glorious 0% track record on this unforgiving surface, while Krueger's lettuce-green win rate stands at 38%.
Diving into their careers, Carabelli is spending most of his time in the rough-and-tumble Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, clinching victory in 75% of the matches. Krueger, doing his best to keep pace, holds a modest 51.35% victory rate in the same arenas. You could say one is gliding while the other is… well, not.
When the apocalypse—or rather, a deciding set—comes, Carabelli embraces the chaos, having won 69% of all of them in the past year. Krueger sprints in with 38% of those epic final thrills. If you're a gambler aiming for heart palpitations, keep an eye on these stats during New York-minute intensity matches.
Who's been rubbing elbows with the finer-ranked players during the past year? Carabelli's opponents boast an average rank of 224.79, whereas Krueger faces slightly less-ranked but still formidable 235.52—though ranking shouldn't be taken lightly, it's like a game of number poker.
Given all these crafty stats that fly around the tennis court, Carabelli seems to have a sneaky upper hand—or racquet, in this case. All things considered, if stats have a say, which they often do, expect Carabelli to triumph by a slim margin, stealing the show, nip and tuck, in this grand tennis gala!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Mitchell Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. U. Carabelli vs M. Krueger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:51:54 | Average Match Time | 1:51:54 |
| 67% (53/79) | 1st Serve % | 62% (50/81) |
| 79% (42/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (33/50) |
| 46% (12/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 38% (31/81) | Return Points Win % | 32% (25/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. U. Carabelli Recent Matches Played
M. Krueger Recent Matches Played

C. U. Carabelli vs M. Krueger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.40% (380/229) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.57% (450/406) |
| 59.23% (834/574) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.65% (1063/956) |
| 53.58% (6986/6052) | Games Win/Loss | 51.08% (9871/9455) |
| 50.68% (37/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.56% (278/241) |
| 64.95% (341/184) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.11% (124/97) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.18% (38/50) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1144 | Aces Total | 2997 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1357 | Total Double Faults | 1728 |
| 1:41:36 | Average Match Time | 1:24:8 |
| 371.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.84 |
| 62% (24524/39653) | 1st Serve % | 62% (30939/49981) |
| 66% (16262/24524) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (21397/30939) |
| 50% (7496/15128) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9663/19042) |
| 45% (2062/4586) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1875/4571) |
| 43% (17156/40178) | Return Points Win % | 38% (19378/50557) |
| 36.36% (8/14) | Slam W/L | 46.03% (29/34) |
| 41.67% (10/14) | Masters W/L | 36.36% (12/21) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Main Tour W/L | 48.00% (36/39) |
| 65.52% (190/100) | Challenger W/L | 49.60% (246/250) |
| 66.97% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 67.20% (127/62) |
| 63% (368/582) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (439/839) |
| 41% (7/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 53% (83/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (134/293) |
| 60% (109/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (135/298) |
| 89% (351/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (458/373) |
| 11% (351/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (458/85) |
| 26% (257/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (398/73) |