Cameron Norrie vs Learner Tien Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Nov at 08:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Norrie vs L. Tien

GBR
1
Win
Played
3
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
3
Win
Head-to-head: Norrie 1 - 3 Tien
They have played 9 sets in total, with Cameron Norrie winning 3 and Learner Tien winning 6. The last match between Learner Tien and Cameron Norrie was at the Moselle Open - Metz, 08-11-2025, Round: F, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-6(6).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Norrie | 1 |
| Tien | 3 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(F) Moselle Open - Metz(11-08-25)
(R3) Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai(10-06-25)
(R1) Abierto Mexicano Telcel - Acapulco(02-24-25)
C. Norrie vs L. Tien H2H Profile
C. Norrie vs L. Tien Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Cameron Norrie and Learner Tien are nearly identical, with Norrie at 46.18% and Tien at 46.13% in recent months. Does this slight edge favor Norrie? Likely not significantly.
- Return Game Stats: Norrie marginally outperforms Tien in recent second serve returns and has a slight advantage in first serve returns as well.
- Under Pressure: Norrie has a slightly better success rate at saving breakpoints compared to Tien, showing resilience under pressure.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Tien has a slightly higher match win percentage than Norrie, indicating consistent performance.
- Best Surface: Both players excel on Hard courts, with an identical win rate of 66%, suggesting an evenly matched contest on this surface.
- Player Level: Tien has a better win percentage on the Main tour compared to Norrie, potentially giving him a competitive edge.
- Direct Head-to-Head: Tien leads Norrie 2-1 in past meetings, winning 4 out of 6 sets, including a recent triumph on a hard court.
- Opponent Quality: Norrie has faced tougher opponents on average with higher rankings, suggesting more experience against elite competition.
- Deciding Set Performance: If it reaches a deciding set, Tien has a better record than Norrie over the past year, hinting at an edge in long matches.
Editorial Prediction (November 7, 2025, UTC):
The comparison of second serve and return game metrics reflects a close match-up, with Cameron Norrie and Learner Tien showing nearly similar performances.
Norrie's slightly better breakpoint saving ability and experience against higher-ranked opponents may offer a minor advantage. However, Tien's superior win rate on the Main tour and past head-to-head victories suggest he might be better poised for success.
Considering their recent performance trends and strengths on Hard courts, the match promises to be tightly contested with Tien holding a slight edge. Acknowledging these aspects and their recent direct encounters, Learner Tien is the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Cameron Norrie vs Learner Tien Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Norrie vs L. Tien H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 3 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 46 | Games Won | 50 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:52:1 | Average Match Time | 1:52:1 |
| 70% (217/308) | 1st Serve % | 64% (203/317) |
| 64% (139/217) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (143/203) |
| 45% (41/91) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (49/114) |
| 33% (11/33) | Break Pts Won % | 54% (13/24) |
| 39% (125/317) | Return Points Win % | 42% (128/308) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Norrie Recent Matches Played
L. Tien Recent Matches Played

C. Norrie vs L. Tien Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.73% (413/256) | YTD Win/Loss | 70.59% (144/60) |
| 58.06% (972/702) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.38% (315/182) |
| 53.05% (8526/7546) | Games Win/Loss | 54.50% (2573/2148) |
| 66.48% (234/118) | Hard Win/Loss | 74.83% (107/36) |
| 62.76% (91/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 35.29% (6/11) |
| 52.25% (58/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (27/9) |
| 49.18% (30/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2820 | Aces Total | 640 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1706 | Total Double Faults | 639 |
| 1:38:18 | Average Match Time | 1:42:9 |
| 345.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 290.5 |
| 65% (30434/46961) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9250/14877) |
| 70% (21373/30434) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6276/9250) |
| 51% (8365/16527) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2925/5627) |
| 42% (1896/4474) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (706/1539) |
| 39% (18368/47243) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6049/14660) |
| 59.49% (47/32) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (7/7) |
| 55.17% (64/52) | Masters W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 46.43% (13/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.07% (160/102) | Main Tour W/L | 67.39% (31/15) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.36% (71/36) | Challenger W/L | 75.00% (39/13) |
| 77.33% (58/17) | Futures W/L | 79.45% (58/15) |
| 62% (366/589) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (132/183) |
| 57% (43/76) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (9/18) |
| 51% (119/233) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (50/81) |
| 60% (137/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 72% (46/64) |
| 86% (398/343) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (122/115) |
| 13% (398/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (122/7) |
| 25% (271/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 34% (82/28) |