Calum Puttergill vs Keegan Smith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Dec at 02:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Puttergill vs K. Smith

AUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Puttergill 0 - 1 Smith
They have played 2 sets in total, with Calum Puttergill winning 0 and Keegan Smith winning 2. The last match between Keegan Smith and Calum Puttergill was at the M15 Hamilton, 10-12-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Keegan Smith getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Puttergill | 0 |
| Smith | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hamilton(12-10-25)
C. Puttergill vs K. Smith H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,570 |
| 49.28% (172-177) | Career Total W/L | 62.72% (217-129) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Puttergill vs K. Smith Match Preview:
- When comparing recent second serve performances, Keegan Smith has captured 46.46% of points, noticeably outperforming Calum Puttergill's 23.08%. Could this be a significant edge for Smith? Yes, it suggests a stronger serve under pressure.
- In return games, Calum Puttergill has a slight advantage on opponents' second serves, winning 42.11% of points compared to Smith's 40.10%. Does this give Puttergill an edge? Not definitively, as first serve returns favor Smith slightly less with Puttergill at 25.00% and Smith at 22.11%.
- Under pressure, Keegan Smith excels in saving breakpoints with a 61.85% success rate, compared to Puttergill’s 25.00%. This is a crucial statistic for in-game moments.
- Looking at performance over the past year, Calum Puttergill has a flawless match win record, though it’s based on only two matches. In contrast, Smith has a solid 67.65% win record over a larger sample of 68 matches. How does this affect our view? Smith's experiences at higher tournament levels suggest a broader competitive edge.
- Examining surface preferences, Puttergill thrives on Clay with a 53% win rate, while Smith performs best on Hard courts with the same win percentage. Puttergill is less effective on I.hard courts, losing his only match. Does court type dictate potential outcomes here? It might, if the match surface aligns with their strengths.
- Competition level is telling; Puttergill has mostly played at Futures/Satellites, undefeated but only in two encounters. Smith, however, has more experience with 46 matches, boasting a 71.74% success rate.
- Regarding quality of opponents, Smith has faced an average opponent rank of 420.97, while Puttergill's competition has not been ranked. Does this experience against ranked players favor Smith? Likely yes, indicating readiness for tougher matches.
- If the match enters a deciding set, Puttergill has consistently succeeded, winning 100% of these high-pressure moments over the last year, whereas Smith has a 56% win rate in similar scenarios.
- Analyzing breakpoint conversion, Puttergill has converted 50.00% of opportunities, outshining Smith who converts at 31.46%. This indicates Puttergill’s ability to capitalize on breaking chances.
Editorial Prediction (December 10, 2025, UTC):
In scrutinizing recent performances, Keegan Smith showcases a significant edge with his exceptional second serve, an area where he clearly outperforms Calum Puttergill. This advantage often translates into competitive match play and can be decisive in critical moments.
Despite Puttergill's perfect, albeit limited, annual win record, it's important to note that his victories have arrived within entry-level tournaments, contrasting with Smith's more extensive and varied competitive experiences. Smith’s consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents indicates his preparedness and adaptability against diverse playing styles.
As the match unfolds, Smith's ability to save breakpoints and his extensive tournament exposure may provide the resilience needed to navigate challenges. While Puttergill demonstrates a strong performance in deciding sets and breakpoint conversion, Smith's holistic game proficiency positions him as the likelier victor in this upcoming contest.
Considering all performance factors and statistical trends, Keegan Smith emerges as the favorite to win this match, given his well-rounded skills and tactical prowess.
Calum Puttergill vs Keegan Smith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Puttergill vs K. Smith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:19:8 | Average Match Time | 1:19:8 |
| 72% (41/57) | 1st Serve % | 82% (41/50) |
| 54% (22/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (30/41) |
| 44% (7/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 30% (15/50) | Return Points Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Puttergill Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 6-1 10-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
K. Smith Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 3-1 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
F | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||

C. Puttergill vs K. Smith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.28% (172/177) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.72% (217/129) |
| 49.31% (392/403) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.59% (475/309) |
| 50.11% (3628/3612) | Games Win/Loss | 53.36% (4037/3528) |
| 48.45% (125/133) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.67% (176/92) |
| 52.78% (38/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.07% (38/31) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 358 | Aces Total | 1966 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1066 | Total Double Faults | 819 |
| 1:2:37 | Average Match Time | 1:25:34 |
| 149.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 469.97 |
| 62% (8932/14358) | 1st Serve % | 69% (14461/20861) |
| 62% (5516/8932) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (10307/14461) |
| 43% (2359/5427) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3289/6400) |
| 46% (720/1577) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (775/1923) |
| 43% (6119/14328) | Return Points Win % | 38% (8100/21413) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 38.36% (28/45) | Challenger W/L | 53.74% (79/68) |
| 52.17% (144/132) | Futures W/L | 69.90% (137/59) |
| 49% (171/347) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (214/343) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (30/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (63/115) |
| 51% (49/97) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/95) |
| 87% (170/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (217/193) |
| 13% (170/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (217/24) |
| 13% (179/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (129/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Anhelina Kalinina vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Shuai Zhang vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets

Gabriela Andrea Knutson vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets

Gabriela Andrea Knutson vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
