Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Oceane Babel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hennemann vs Babel analysis and find out who is favored!
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Oceane Babel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hennemann has won 45.1% of points on his second serve, while Babel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hennemann, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Babel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hennemann has saved 50.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Babel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hennemann has won 63.49% of matches played (W/L 40/ 23), with Babel winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17). Babel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 19/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16), where as Babel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hennemann winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hennemann winning 2 and Babel winning 0. The last match between Hennemann and Babel was at the W15 Saint Palais sur Mer, 10-09-2020, Quarterfinals, Clay with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hennemann and Babel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hennemann winning 0 times and Babel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hennemann winning 0, and Babel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.32 while Babel has played against players with an average rank of 168.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hennemann has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Babel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hennemann has converted 48.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Babel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hennemann 1 - 0 Babel
5
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
447
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
442
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
62% (154-96)
Career Total W/L
50% (64-63)
74% (20-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Oceane Babel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
1st Serve % | 80% (39/49) | 58% (29/50) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (24/39) | 41% (12/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (4/10) | 29% (6/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 64% (32/50) | 43% (21/49) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Oceane Babel
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Oceane Babel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 74% (20/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 73% (43/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (318/237) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 89% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:31 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 282.48 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1096/1588) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (681/1096) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (219/492) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (124/250) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 51% (786/1553) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (20/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Iva Primorac
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Anastasia Iamachkine
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
87%
(
34 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Oceane Babel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Oceane Babel
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oceane Babel
Player
Anna Ozerova
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
43%
(
32 of
74)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
11
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maileen Nuudi
Player
Oceane Babel
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oceane Babel
Player
Jana Otzipka
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Andreea Mitu
Player
Oceane Babel
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
48%
(
33 of
69)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
52%
(
48 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
55 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oceane Babel
Player
Eleejah Inisan
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
73%
(
81 of
111)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mia Chudejova
Player
Oceane Babel
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
15%
(
2 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Oceane Babel
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 2-6 10-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Pia Lovric
Player
Oceane Babel
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more