Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Elena Malygina Important H2H Prediction Stats:

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hennemann has won 44.4% of points on his second serve, while Malygina has won 47.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hennemann, in recent form, has won 56.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Malygina has won 57.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.11% and 45.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Hennemann has saved 48.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Malygina has saved 50.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Hennemann has won 65.15% of matches played (W/L 43/ 23), with Malygina winning 60.34% (W/L 35/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17). Malygina has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 82/ 54), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 19/ 18).
• Player level: In the last year, Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16), where as Malygina has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hennemann winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Hennemann winning 2 and Malygina winning 2. The last match between Hennemann and Malygina was at the W25 Helsinki, 17-11-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Elena Malygina getting the victory .
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:40:30.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Hennemann and Malygina have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hennemann winning 0 times and Malygina 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hennemann winning 0, and Malygina 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.88 while Malygina has played against players with an average rank of 234.71.
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hennemann has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Malygina has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
• Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Hennemann has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Malygina has converted 54.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.