Cadence Brace vs Dalayna Hewitt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Aug at 07:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Brace vs D. Hewitt

CAN
2
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Brace 2 - 1 Hewitt
They have played 7 sets in total, with Cadence Brace winning 5 and Dalayna Hewitt winning 2. The last match between Cadence Brace and Dalayna Hewitt was at the W35 Southaven, 05-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cadence Brace getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brace | 2 |
| Hewitt | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Southaven(08-05-25)
(R1) W60+H Calgary(11-08-23)
(R1) W25 Toronto(03-01-23)
C. Brace vs D. Hewitt H2H Profile
C. Brace vs D. Hewitt Match Preview:
- In recent second serve performance, Brace slightly outperforms Hewitt by winning 39.98% of points compared to Hewitt's 38.29%. Does this give Brace an edge in the match? Possibly.
- Brace also excels in return games, winning 50.52% of opponent's second serves versus Hewitt's 45.55%, and leads in first serve returns too by 34.68% to Hewitt’s 28.07%.
- Under pressure, Hewitt shows slightly better resilience by saving 45.32% of breakpoints, compared to Brace’s 44.51%. Could this small difference be crucial? It might in critical moments.
- Match win rate over the past year heavily favors Brace, who has a 63.89% win rate compared to Hewitt’s 46.34%.
- Best career surface win percentages show Hewitt has the edge on indoor hard courts with 55%, while Brace is strongest on hard courts at 61%.
- Brace’s performance in Challengers/ITF tournaments is superior, achieving a 65.71% winning rate compared to Hewitt’s 32.14%.
- In their head-to-head, both players have 1 win each, but Brace has the lead in sets won, 3 to 2. Yet, Hewitt claimed their last encounter in November 2023.
- Brace seems more successful in tiebreaks against Hewitt, winning their only tiebreak encounter so far.
- Against all opponents in deciding sets over the past year, Brace stands out with a 65% win rate, compared to Hewitt’s 14%.
- In recent form, Brace has a higher breakpoint conversion rate, capitalizing 45.33% of opportunities, surpassing Hewitt’s 34.48%.
Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing both players' recent performances and comparing head-to-head encounters, Brace displays a marginal advantage in second serve success and return games, essential components for any match strategy.
Brace's significantly higher win rate over the past year and superior performance in tournaments further tilt the scales in their favor. Despite Hewitt winning their last head-to-head, incremental advantages in several impactful areas persist in Brace’s performance.
Although Hewitt is marginally better under pressure and on indoor hard courts, Brace’s dominance in deciding sets and break conversions could prove decisive in tight scenarios.
Considering these factors, Brace is positioned as the more likely winner in this upcoming match against Hewitt.
Cadence Brace vs Dalayna Hewitt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Brace vs D. Hewitt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 35 | Games Won | 27 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 30 |
| 1:44:46 | Average Match Time | 1:44:46 |
| 56% (113/202) | 1st Serve % | 54% (103/192) |
| 66% (75/113) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (68/103) |
| 48% (43/89) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (34/89) |
| 67% (12/18) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (9/24) |
| 47% (90/192) | Return Points Win % | 42% (84/202) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Brace Recent Matches Played
D. Hewitt Recent Matches Played

C. Brace vs D. Hewitt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.15% (126/87) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.62% (131/133) |
| 58.49% (279/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.33% (307/303) |
| 54.56% (2326/1937) | Games Win/Loss | 50.51% (2872/2814) |
| 61.72% (79/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.57% (89/87) |
| 56.67% (34/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.24% (13/21) |
| 52.00% (13/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.70% (29/25) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
| 269 | Aces Total | 1708 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.49 |
| 584 | Total Double Faults | 1349 |
| 1:45:28 | Average Match Time | 1:28:36 |
| 449.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.38 |
| 61% (8192/13411) | 1st Serve % | 58% (9034/15610) |
| 62% (5042/8192) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6424/9034) |
| 47% (2461/5219) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3031/6576) |
| 53% (863/1641) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (737/1728) |
| 47% (6115/12966) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6730/16506) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 58.64% (112/79) | Challenger W/L | 45.60% (88/105) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 62.12% (41/25) |
| 60% (124/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (130/261) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (17/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (26/67) |
| 48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (38/83) |
| 90% (125/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (142/111) |
| 10% (125/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (142/30) |
| 15% (88/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (122/20) |