Brandon Nakashima vs Mikhail Kukushkin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 May at 12:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nakashima vs M. Kukushkin

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

KAZ
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nakashima 2 - 0 Kukushkin
They have played 4 sets in total, with Brandon Nakashima winning 4 and Mikhail Kukushkin winning 0. The last match between Brandon Nakashima and Mikhail Kukushkin was at the Bordeaux Challenger, 15-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakashima | 2 |
| Kukushkin | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Bordeaux Challenger(05-15-25)
(R1) Bergamo Challenger(10-31-23)
B. Nakashima vs M. Kukushkin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,667,225 | Career Prize Money | $3,944,910 |
| 60.37% (259-170) | Career Total W/L | 56.27% (655-509) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 18 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 52.46% (32-29) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
B. Nakashima vs M. Kukushkin Match Preview:
- Nakashima has a slight advantage in second serve points, winning 47.18% compared to Kukushkin's 46.48% over the past six months. Does this suggest Nakashima is more consistent with their second serve? Yes, though the margin is small.
- In return games, Kukushkin outperforms Nakashima, especially on second serve returns with 49.3% compared to 41.87%. Could this return efficiency be a decisive factor? It potentially gives Kukushkin an edge in breaking Nakashima's serve.
- Under pressure, Nakashima saves breakpoints slightly better at 55.36% compared to Kukushkin's 51.22%. How critical is break point saving? It's crucial for maintaining service games under pressure.
- Over the last year, Nakashima's win percentage is 57.33% while Kukushkin's is 55.07%. Does this consistency hint at a slight general advantage for Nakashima? It suggests more reliable performance.
- Nakashima has a career best win percentage on indoor hard courts at 70%, whereas Kukushkin excels on hard surfaces with a 59% win rate. Given these stats, might playing surface favor Nakashima more? Possibly, especially if the match is indoors.
- Their previous head-to-head encounter ended in Nakashima's favor, with him winning both sets. Does this set the stage for another Nakashima win? Prior performance may predict a similar outcome.
- Nakashima has faced stronger opponents on average, with an opponent ranking of 84.93 compared to Kukushkin's 231.65. Can this exposure to tougher competition give Nakashima an edge? Likely in adapting to high-pressure situations
- In breakpoint conversion, Nakashima leads slightly at 36.36% over Kukushkin's 32.5%. Could this be decisive in crucial moments? Perhaps, particularly in contested games.
- Kukushkin has a higher win rate in deciding sets at 65% compared to Nakashima's 55%, potentially favoring him if the match extends. Might this resilience be critical in close matches? Yes, especially if the match is tightly contested.
Editorial Prediction (May 15, 2025, UTC):
In their upcoming match, Nakashima and Kukushkin both bring unique strengths and slight vulnerabilities to the court. Nakashima's better performance on second serves and slightly higher break point saving ability suggest he maintains an edge in critical service and pressure situations.
Though Kukushkin displays stronger return stats, particularly on the second serve, Nakashima's overall match win consistency and past head-to-head victory could be significant indicators of his potential to prevail. Factor in Nakashima's experience against higher-ranked opponents and historically stronger performance on indoor hard courts, and the scales may tip in his favor.
Despite Kukushkin's capacity to perform well in deciding sets, Nakashima's combined advantages suggest he is the likely candidate to secure a win in this matchup.
Brandon Nakashima vs Mikhail Kukushkin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Nakashima vs M. Kukushkin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 13 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:18:14 | Average Match Time | 1:18:14 |
| 63% (67/106) | 1st Serve % | 68% (78/115) |
| 84% (56/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (50/78) |
| 72% (28/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/5) |
| 40% (46/115) | Return Points Win % | 21% (22/106) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(7) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
M. Kukushkin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(2) 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

B. Nakashima vs M. Kukushkin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.37% (259/170) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.27% (655/509) |
| 58.66% (623/439) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.93% (1554/1275) |
| 52.93% (5576/4959) | Games Win/Loss | 51.80% (14027/13052) |
| 60.48% (127/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.86% (259/181) |
| 50.00% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.68% (201/160) |
| 67.00% (67/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.31% (165/128) |
| 61.22% (30/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (30/40) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2971 | Aces Total | 2891 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 711 | Total Double Faults | 1327 |
| 1:46:48 | Average Match Time | 1:15:14 |
| 282.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 512.81 |
| 64% (20242/31697) | 1st Serve % | 62% (42493/68808) |
| 74% (15063/20242) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (28676/42493) |
| 54% (6180/11455) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (13848/26310) |
| 37% (1023/2729) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2689/6336) |
| 37% (12113/32928) | Return Points Win % | 38% (26146/67925) |
| 48.89% (22/23) | Slam W/L | 48.74% (58/61) |
| 46.97% (31/35) | Masters W/L | 46.40% (58/67) |
| 100.00% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 58.86% (93/65) | Main Tour W/L | 48.04% (159/172) |
| 69.40% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 65.42% (314/166) |
| 73.91% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 63.93% (39/22) |
| 60% (229/379) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (594/1040) |
| 57% (26/46) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (51/110) |
| 54% (135/248) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (208/435) |
| 50% (67/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (175/353) |
| 85% (261/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (667/557) |
| 15% (261/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (667/108) |
| 20% (167/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (497/95) |