Brandon Nakashima vs Alexander Zverev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 09:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nakashima vs A. Zverev

USA
0
Win
Played
5
Win

GER
0
Win
Played
5
Win
Head-to-head: Nakashima 0 - 5 Zverev
They have played 15 sets in total, with Brandon Nakashima winning 2 and Alexander Zverev winning 13. The last match between Alexander Zverev and Brandon Nakashima was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 13-08-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Alexander Zverev getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakashima | 0 |
| Zverev | 5 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(R3) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-13-25)
(QF) Boss Open - Stuttgart(06-13-25)
(R4) U.S. Open - New York(09-01-24)
B. Nakashima vs A. Zverev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,667,225 | Career Prize Money | $33,773,994 |
| 60.66% (259-168) | Career Total W/L | 67.96% (596-281) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 3 |
| 8 | Titles | 27 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 5 |
| 54.24% (32-27) | YTD Win/Loss | 70.42% (50-21) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
B. Nakashima vs A. Zverev Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Nakashima's and Zverev's second serve success rates are incredibly close, at 47.71% and 47.82% respectively. Could this indicator be crucial in forecasting the match's outcome? It's quite possible given its importance in predictions.
- Recent return game statistics show Zverev slightly ahead in winning second serve points, with 43.97% compared to Nakashima's 42.73%. Also, Zverev leads in first serve returns with 24.12% against Nakashima's 23.82%.
- Under pressure, Nakashima has proven slightly more resilient, saving 59.55% of breakpoints, compared to Zverev's 54.11%—a factor that could influence in-game dynamics.
- Over the last year, Zverev has a superior match-winning percentage—74.07% compared to Nakashima's 55.22%, indicating a higher overall form.
- Evidently, Nakashima performs best on indoor hard courts with a 70% win rate, whereas Zverev excels on clay, also with 70% wins. This calls into question: how could surface influence the players?
- Comparing their tour levels, Nakashima competes primarily on the Main tour, holding a 54.29% success rate, while Zverev plays more on the Masters series with a high 73.33% win rate.
- In their direct encounters, Zverev has dominated with a 4-0 record, winning 11 of 13 sets contested, highlighting a strong head-to-head advantage.
- Their matches average 1 hour and 45 minutes in duration, suggesting closely fought contests despite one-sided results.
- The deciding set performances tip slightly in Zverev's favor, winning 48% compared to Nakashima’s 43% in the past year.
- Zverev faced higher-ranked opponents recently, with an average rank of 51.01, showing experience against tougher competition compared to Nakashima's opponents averaging a rank of 75.01.
- Currently, Zverev edges out in converting breakpoints, achieving 33.94% compared to Nakashima's 32.18% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
Brandon Nakashima and Alexander Zverev enter this match with extremely similar second serve performance statistics, yet Zverev slightly edges out in overall return game statistics.
The head-to-head record heavily favors Zverev, who has consistently managed to secure victories against Nakashima without dropping a single match, reflecting a significant psychological advantage.
Considering both players’ success on their preferred surfaces, Zverev's broader experience and better performance on the Masters series indicate a higher level of current competition exposure compared to Nakashima.
Zverev's slightly superior breakpoint conversion and ability to handle higher-ranked opponents without much trouble adds an additional layer of strength to his game.
In conclusion, given the statistics and past performances, Zverev is the more probable winner in this upcoming match.
Brandon Nakashima vs Alexander Zverev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Nakashima vs A. Zverev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 5 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 13 |
| 59 | Games Won | 91 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 58 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:43:36 | Average Match Time | 1:43:36 |
| 61% (227/375) | 1st Serve % | 73% (244/335) |
| 66% (149/227) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (199/244) |
| 53% (78/148) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (47/91) |
| 8% (1/12) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (15/35) |
| 27% (89/335) | Return Points Win % | 39% (148/375) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
A. Zverev Recent Matches Played

B. Nakashima vs A. Zverev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.66% (259/168) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.96% (596/281) |
| 58.88% (623/435) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.96% (1459/822) |
| 53.00% (5562/4933) | Games Win/Loss | 53.86% (12068/10338) |
| 60.48% (127/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.05% (236/116) |
| 50.00% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 70.20% (212/90) |
| 68.37% (67/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.45% (103/52) |
| 61.22% (30/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.18% (45/23) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.6 |
| 2952 | Aces Total | 6637 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 711 | Total Double Faults | 2928 |
| 1:46:52 | Average Match Time | 1:48:20 |
| 277.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 323.71 |
| 64% (20168/31577) | 1st Serve % | 66% (42618/64405) |
| 74% (15012/20168) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (31653/42618) |
| 54% (6161/11409) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (11051/21779) |
| 38% (1022/2721) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (2582/6342) |
| 37% (12068/32789) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25872/67366) |
| 48.89% (22/23) | Slam W/L | 73.75% (118/42) |
| 47.69% (31/34) | Masters W/L | 69.79% (164/71) |
| 100.00% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 54.17% (26/22) |
| 59.24% (93/64) | Main Tour W/L | 68.54% (207/95) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 62.96% (17/10) |
| 69.40% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 59.65% (34/23) |
| 73.91% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 55.26% (21/17) |
| 61% (229/377) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (475/710) |
| 57% (26/46) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 73% (116/160) |
| 55% (135/247) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (234/394) |
| 50% (67/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (168/291) |
| 85% (261/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (576/497) |
| 15% (261/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (576/79) |
| 21% (165/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (301/99) |