B. Nakashima
To Win
S. Ofner
To Win
Brandon Nakashima vs Alejandro Tabilo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
L L W L W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Nakashima 1 - 1 Tabilo
They have played 6 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 3 and Tabilo winning 3. The last match between Nakashima and Tabilo was at the Davis Cup, Group C, Zhuhai, 11-09-2024, Rubber 2, I.hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 1 |
| Alejandro Tabilo | 1 |
Davis Cup, Group C, Zhuhai(11-09-2024)
7
6
2
6
7
6
| Nakashima | Stats | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 29% (4-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 32 | Ranking | 35 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 8 | Titles | 11 |
| 61% (238-151) | Career Total W/L | 59% (365-252) |
| $3,035,300 | Career Prize Money | $2,155,340 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
18
Aces
27
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
43 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
31 of
107)
107
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 33 |
| 30 | Aces (Total) | 40 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:6:28 | Average Match Time | 1:6:28 |
| 67% (135/201) | 1st Serve % | 68% (140/205) |
| 69% (93/135) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (109/140) |
| 50% (33/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (27/65) |
| 19% (3/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (6/17) |
| 34% (69/205) | Return Points Win % | 37% (75/201) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alejandro Tabilo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Novak Djokovic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Stan Wawrinka
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
115)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
110
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
50%
(
58 of
115)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
18%
(
11 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Corentin Moutet
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
72%
(
77 of
107)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Dusan Lajovic
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(11) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (238/151) | Win/Loss | 59% (365/252) |
| 59% (569/389) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (819/617) |
| 53% (5025/4409) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7145/6396) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (102/74) |
| 51% (31/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (214/138) |
| 69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (37/30) |
| 60% (24/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 2613 | Aces Total | 2429 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 667 | Total Double Faults | 1886 |
| 1:44:53 | Average Match Time | 1:24:12 |
| 264.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.29 |
| 64% (17964/28288) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23087/37467) |
| 75% (13387/17964) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (16334/23087) |
| 54% (5589/10324) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6896/14380) |
| 38% (939/2479) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1564/3630) |
| 37% (10915/29442) | Return Points Win % | 40% (14712/36954) |
| 49% (19/20) | Slam W/L | 50% (17/17) |
| 48% (27/29) | Masters W/L | 61% (27/17) |
| 100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 59% (80/56) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (44/42) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (92/40) | Challenger W/L | 64% (122/70) |
| 74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 61% (149/96) |
| 61% (212/346) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (353/596) |
| 57% (23/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 55% (118/215) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (96/186) |
| 50% (61/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (97/183) |
| 86% (240/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (364/312) |
| 14% (240/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (364/52) |
| 20% (148/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (252/50) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
