Braden Shick vs Fons Van Sambeek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Shick vs F. Van Sambeek

Braden Shick
USA
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
23
-
Height
-
866
C. Rank
0
866
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Fons Van Sambeek
NED
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
23
-
Height
-
866
C. Rank
0
866
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Shick 1 - 0 Sambeek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Braden Shick winning 2 and Fons Van Sambeek winning 0. The last match between Braden Shick and Fons Van Sambeek was at the M15 Ithaca, 03-11-2022, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Braden Shick getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shick | 1 |
| Sambeek | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Ithaca(11-03-22)
Braden Shick
6
6
Fons Van Sambeek
2
2
B. Shick vs F. V. Sambeek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.89% (44-32) | Career Total W/L | 52.21% (59-54) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Shick vs F. V. Sambeek Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Braden Shick has won 47.02% of points on their second serve, while Fons Van Sambeek has won 47.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Braden Shick, in recent form, has won 40.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fons Van Sambeek has won 44.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.38% and 29.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Braden Shick has saved 49.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fons Van Sambeek has saved 53.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Braden Shick has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 22/14), with Fons Van Sambeek winning 51.85% (W/L 14/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Braden Shick has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 33/26). Fons Van Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 24/19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 26/26).
- Player level: In the last year, Braden Shick has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/10), where as Fons Van Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Braden Shick winning 1 times and Fons Van Sambeek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Braden Shick winning 2 and Fons Van Sambeek winning 0.
- The last match between Braden Shick and Fons Van Sambeek was at the M15 Ithaca, 03-11-2022, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Braden Shick getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Braden Shick has played against opponents with an average rank of 327.75 while Fons Van Sambeek has played against players with an average rank of 238.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Braden Shick has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fons Van Sambeek has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Braden Shick has converted 27.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fons Van Sambeek has converted 30.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Braden Shick vs Fons Van Sambeek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Shick vs F. V. Sambeek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:19:0 | Average Match Time | 1:19:0 |
| 64% (30/47) | 1st Serve % | 72% (41/57) |
| 70% (21/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (23/41) |
| 65% (11/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 53% (30/57) | Return Points Win % | 32% (15/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Shick 53%, Sambeek 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Shick 48%, Sambeek 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Shick 64%, Sambeek 54%.
B. Shick Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
F | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
F. V. Sambeek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | w/o | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||

B. Shick vs F. V. Sambeek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.89% (44/32) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.21% (59/54) |
| 58.02% (94/68) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.55% (134/121) |
| 53.96% (811/692) | Games Win/Loss | 50.97% (1255/1207) |
| 55.93% (33/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.81% (24/19) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (26/26) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 226 | Aces Total | 126 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 120 | Total Double Faults | 185 |
| 1:4:59 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 296.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 338.43 |
| 58% (1802/3125) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2839/4479) |
| 70% (1260/1802) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1804/2839) |
| 51% (669/1323) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (770/1640) |
| 44% (126/286) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (195/443) |
| 38% (1175/3052) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1760/4314) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 63.24% (43/25) | Futures W/L | 53.70% (58/50) |
| 58% (43/74) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (59/113) |
| 48% (10/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (11/22) |
| 42% (5/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 93% (44/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (66/57) |
| 7% (44/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (66/9) |
| 9% (32/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (47/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:35 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal