Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Boy Westerhof vs Richard Muzaev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Westerhof vs Muzaev analysis and find out who is favored!
Boy Westerhof vs Richard Muzaev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Westerhof has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Muzaev has won 57.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Westerhof, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Muzaev has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Westerhof has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Muzaev has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Westerhof has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Muzaev winning 66.67% (W/L 2/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Westerhof has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 97/ 52), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Muzaev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 80/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 45/ 41).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Westerhof winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Westerhof winning 3 and Muzaev winning 0. The last match between Westerhof and Muzaev was at the Russia F4, 02-06-2014, First, Clay with Boy Westerhof getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Westerhof and Muzaev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Westerhof winning 0 times and Muzaev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Westerhof winning 0, and Muzaev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Westerhof has played against opponents with an average rank of while Muzaev has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Westerhof has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Muzaev has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Westerhof has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Muzaev has converted 14.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Westerhof 2 - 0 Muzaev
Ret.
Rank
201
High
38
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
877
Rank
560
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
61% (380-246)
Career Total W/L
53% (171-151)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$20,450
Career Prize Money
$6,920
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Boy Westerhof | Richard Muzaev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 0 |
| Games Won | 18 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
| 6-1 ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Boy Westerhof | Richard Muzaev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Boy Westerhof Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mick Lescure
Player
Boy Westerhof
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yannick Vandenbulcke
Player
Boy Westerhof
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
93)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Boy Westerhof
Player
Maxime Mora
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Boy Westerhof
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Boy Westerhof
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Boy Westerhof
Player
Shahar Elbaz
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Boy Westerhof
Player
Ido Zonder
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Boy Westerhof
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Boy Westerhof
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Richard Muzaev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Grigory Shebekin
Player
Richard Muzaev
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Richard Muzaev
Player
Semen Voronin
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
23 of
27)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Muzaev
Player
Petr Kapuskin
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrey Uvarov
Player
Richard Muzaev
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Muzaev
Player
Alexandr Semenov
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergei Pogosian
Player
Richard Muzaev
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Richard Muzaev
Player
Ivan Mikhaylyuk
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
80%
(
52 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Muzaev
Player
Artem Dacenko
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Westerhof Vs Muzaev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
