Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Dancu analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 48.69% of points on his second serve, while Dancu has won 49.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dancu has won 48.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.11% and 36.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dancu has saved 62.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 24/ 28), with Dancu winning 61.04% (W/L 47/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Dancu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 110), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Dancu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.64% of matches (W/L 45/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zandschulp winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Dancu winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Dancu was at the M25 Doboj, 16-05-2019, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Dancu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Dancu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Dancu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.96 while Dancu has played against players with an average rank of 175.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dancu has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 37.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dancu has converted 48.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 0 Dancu
112
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
503
Rank
503
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
63% (330-195)
Career Total W/L
59% (182-126)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$2,870,600
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Dancu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (63/99) | 51% (67/132) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (50/63) | 49% (33/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (24/36) | 60% (39/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (60/132) | 25% (25/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Zandschulp VS Dancu H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 57% (13/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (22/31) | 52% (32/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (247/275) | 52% (323/303) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 57% (13/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 110 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:13:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 174.83 | 135.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1047/1660) | 57% (1149/2013) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (717/1047) | 66% (762/1149) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (294/613) | 49% (427/864) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (54/143) | 50% (88/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (612/1632) | 42% (787/1881) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (13/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (10/22) | 57% (13/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 63% (10/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 50% (14/7) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlad Andrei Dancu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
52%
(
59 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Vuk Radjenovic
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
81)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Peter Hampe
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
62 of
90)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 6-7(4) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Drazen Petrovic
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
4-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Francesco Cano
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
85)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
50 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Dancu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Vlad Andrei Dancu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
