search

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ugo Humbert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - 07-03-24

By Wojtek Kolan - July 3, 2024

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Humbert analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Zandschulp VS Humbert PREDICTION Grass

Wimbledon - London atp

03 Jul 2024 / Second

ODDS
PREDICTION
Value

Botic Van De Zandschulp

To Win

lock
lock

Ugo Humbert

To Win

lock
lock

Zandschulp Vs Humbert Match Overview - When Will They Play?

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ugo Humbert Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 0 - 4 Humbert

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 46.1% of points on their second serve, while Humbert has won 55.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 48.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Humbert has won 51.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.48% and 29.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 57.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Humbert has saved 67.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 49.09% of matches played (W/L 27/ 28), with Humbert winning 65.71% (W/L 46/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 11/ 12). Humbert has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 137/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 47/ 50).
  • Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 9/ 13), where as Humbert has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72.5% of matches (W/L 29/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Humbert being victorious 4 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 1 and Humbert winning 8. The last match between Zandschulp and Humbert was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 26-04-2024, Second, Clay with Ugo Humbert getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:51.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Humbert have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Humbert 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Humbert 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.91 while Humbert has played against players with an average rank of 114.76.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Humbert has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 37.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Humbert has converted 38.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Botic Van De Zandschulp

7

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

97

Rank

22

High

28

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

4

0

Hard

2

0

Clay

2

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

16

Rank

13

High

26

Age

L

Plays

Ugo Humbert

19

Total

0

Mast

9

Chall

0

Slam

6

Main

4

Minor

0

Total

4

0

Hard

2

0

Clay

2

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W W W L W L L L W

Form

W L L L W L W L L W

63% (333-199)

Career Total W/L

61% (326-206)

42% (13-18)

YTD W/L

63% (22-13)

$3,043,825

Career Prize Money

$3,704,750

0

YTD Titles

2

Current Event Stats To Check Player Form & Enhance Prediction Accuracy

GBR

Wimbledon - London

Grass
stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Ugo Humbert
Total Matches 1 1
Last Match 2:28:00 3:18:00
Total Time 2:28:00 3:18:00
Aces Pg 0.53 0.64
Aces Total 9 16
DFs Per Game 0.65 0
DFs Total 11 0
1st Serve % 57% (59/104) 64% (86/134)
1st Serve Win% 86% (51/59) 79% (68/86)
2nd Serve Win% 44% (20/45) 58% (28/48)
Total BPs Won% 35% (7/20) 44% (7/16)
Total BPs Saved 63% (5/8) 70% (7/10)
Service Hold (%) 82% (14/17) 88% (22/25)
Opp Hold (%) 59% (10/17) 72% (18/25)
Return Pts W% 45% (50/110) 40% (64/161)
Total Pts Won 57% (121/214) 54% (160/295)
Tiebreak W% 0% (0/0) 50% (1/2)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
TBs Per Match 0.00 2.00
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Zandschulp Vs Humbert Prediction H2H Video

YouTube video

Zandschulp Vs Humbert Prediction: Who Wins?

TennisTipster88 : After in-depth analysis of past career performance, current form, and the head-to-head matches of Botic Van De Zandschulp and Ugo Humbert, we give Zandschulp a 32.48% chance of winning and Humbert 67.52% chance of victory. Our prediction: Humbert wins. If you want to bet on this match it's very important you take the best odds available into consideration as it is the odds value relative to the probability of the outcome that is important. Check out our today's tennis predictions page for full value bet analysis of this and all WTA, ATP and ITF tennis matches!

banner

The Best Odds For Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ugo Humbert For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zandschulp VS Humbert

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Zandschulp VS Humbert H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Ugo Humbert
All H2H Matches 0 4
Sets Won 1 8
Games Won 32 48
Aces (Total) 16 8
DFs Total 16 11
Avg Match Time 1:32:51 1:32:51
1st Serve % 60% (142/235) 64% (162/253)
1st Serve Win% 65% (93/142) 72% (116/162)
2nd Serve Win% 41% (38/93) 45% (41/91)
BPs Won% (Total) 53% (9/17) 55% (16/29)
Return Points W% 38% (96/253) 44% (104/235)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/4) 100% (4/4)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 100% (4/4)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (4/0)
1st set L, W 0% (4/0) 0% (0/0)

Zandschulp VS Humbert H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-3
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
61
Total Points Won
50
6-4 6-3
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70% ( 44 of 63)
1st Serve %
65% ( 35 of 54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84% ( 37 of 44)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 23 of 35)
32% ( 6 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 20 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 54)
66
Total Points Won
51
6-4 1-6 6-2
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 44 of 75)
1st Serve %
61% ( 40 of 66)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
59% ( 26 of 44)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 28 of 40)
48% ( 15 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 9 of 26)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
56% ( 5 of 9)
45% ( 34 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 29 of 66)
70
Total Points Won
71
7-6(4) 4-1 ret.
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve %
54% ( 34 of 63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 22 of 34)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
36% ( 20 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 28 of 63)
64
Total Points Won
55

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Ugo Humbert
YTD W/L 48% (11/12) 56% (25/20)
Sets Win/Loss 51% (36/35) 53% (69/60)
Games Win/Loss 51% (352/344) 51% (672/646)
Aces pg 0.58 0.57
Aces Total 199 372
DFs per game 0.37 0.24
DFs Total 127 154
Avg Match Time 2:6:35 2:6:55
Avg Opp Rank 126.09 123.6
1st Serve % 62% (1277/2076) 63% (2613/4118)
1st Serve W% 74% (942/1277) 74% (1941/2613)
2nd Serve W% 49% (392/799) 51% (771/1505)
BPs Won% Total 35% (74/210) 35% (117/332)
Return Pts W% 37% (805/2167) 35% (1471/4160)
Best of 3 Sets W% 38% (5/13) 54% (19/35)
Best of 5 Sets W% 60% (6/10) 60% (6/10)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (7/14) 55% (16/29)
Deciding Set W% 25% (2/8) 52% (11/21)
1st set W, W 75% (12/9) 69% (26/18)
1st set W, L 25% (12/3) 31% (26/8)
1st set L, W 18% (11/2) 37% (19/7)

Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Liam Broady
57% ( 59 of 104)
1st Serve %
55% ( 61 of 110)
9
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
86% ( 51 of 59)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 38 of 61)
44% ( 20 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 22 of 49)
35% ( 7 of 20)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
32% ( 33 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 50 of 110)
121
Total Points Won
93
W
6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67% ( 57 of 85)
1st Serve %
55% ( 51 of 92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63% ( 36 of 57)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 37 of 51)
46% ( 13 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 12 of 41)
35% ( 6 of 17)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
42% ( 36 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 43 of 92)
92
Total Points Won
85
L
6-4 4-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 50 of 85)
1st Serve %
54% ( 41 of 76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74% ( 37 of 50)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 24 of 41)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 10 of 35)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
35% ( 30 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 42 of 76)
97
Total Points Won
64
L
6-1 6-1 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47% ( 36 of 77)
1st Serve %
64% ( 48 of 75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58% ( 21 of 36)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 29 of 48)
61% ( 25 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
58% ( 7 of 12)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
40% ( 31 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 38 of 75)
84
Total Points Won
68
L
6-2 4-6 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve %
60% ( 30 of 50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83% ( 20 of 24)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
28% ( 10 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
64% ( 32 of 50)
58
Total Points Won
28
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61% ( 54 of 88)
1st Serve %
47% ( 28 of 59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72% ( 39 of 54)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
41% ( 14 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 35 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 26 of 59)
79
Total Points Won
68
L
6-1 7-6(6) H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66% ( 87 of 132)
1st Serve %
59% ( 71 of 121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71% ( 62 of 87)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 50 of 71)
58% ( 26 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 30 of 50)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
33% ( 44 of 132)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 41 of 121)
129
Total Points Won
124
W
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) H2H
QF
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68% ( 39 of 57)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 16 of 35)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 20 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
45
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
63
Total Points Won
48
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57% ( 57 of 100)
1st Serve %
58% ( 57 of 99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77% ( 44 of 57)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 43 of 57)
63% ( 27 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
29% ( 29 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 34 of 99)
105
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 H2H

Ugo Humbert Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
64% ( 86 of 134)
1st Serve %
55% ( 89 of 161)
16
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
79% ( 68 of 86)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 57 of 89)
58% ( 28 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 40 of 72)
44% ( 7 of 16)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
28% ( 38 of 134)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 64 of 161)
160
Total Points Won
135
W
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Ugo Humbert
71% ( 67 of 94)
1st Serve %
62% ( 60 of 97)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
64% ( 43 of 67)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 39 of 60)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
19% ( 3 of 16)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
36% ( 34 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 37 of 97)
97
Total Points Won
94
L
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Ugo Humbert
54% ( 49 of 90)
1st Serve %
64% ( 55 of 86)
9
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
76% ( 37 of 49)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 40 of 55)
61% ( 25 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 19 of 31)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
31% ( 28 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 27 of 86)
89
Total Points Won
87
L
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) H2H
SF
cross
Alex De Minaur
Player
Ugo Humbert
57% ( 39 of 68)
1st Serve %
56% ( 44 of 78)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 31 of 44)
52% ( 15 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 13 of 34)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
32% ( 22 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 34 of 78)
80
Total Points Won
66
L
7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Gijs Brouwer
64% ( 61 of 95)
1st Serve %
73% ( 68 of 93)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
72% ( 44 of 61)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 44 of 68)
41% ( 14 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
31% ( 5 of 16)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
39% ( 37 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 40 of 93)
98
Total Points Won
90
W
4-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Arthur Fils
77% ( 49 of 64)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82% ( 40 of 49)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 29 of 39)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 12 of 23)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
22% ( 14 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 21 of 62)
71
Total Points Won
55
W
6-3 7-6(1) H2H
R1
cross
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Ugo Humbert
71% ( 74 of 104)
1st Serve %
55% ( 63 of 115)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76% ( 56 of 74)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 47 of 63)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 25 of 52)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
30% ( 31 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 43 of 115)
116
Total Points Won
103
L
6-4 2-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Ugo Humbert
71% ( 54 of 76)
1st Serve %
67% ( 62 of 93)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63% ( 34 of 54)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 41 of 62)
50% ( 11 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 13 of 31)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
41% ( 31 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 39 of 93)
84
Total Points Won
85
L
2-6 6-4 6-4 H2H
R3
cross
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Ugo Humbert
54% ( 34 of 63)
1st Serve %
71% ( 48 of 68)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 36 of 48)
72% ( 21 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
25% ( 16 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 22 of 68)
69
Total Points Won
62
L
7-5 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
61
Total Points Won
50
W
6-3 6-3 H2H

Zandschulp Vs Humbert Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Zandschulp are available here and Humbert photos here.


Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp

Wimbledon - London

Tiafoe vs Zandschulp H2H Pick , could play in The Fourth round

Coric vs Zandschulp H2H Pick , could play in The Fourth round

Vukic vs Zandschulp H2H Pick , could play in The Fourth round

Alcaraz vs Zandschulp H2H Pick , could play in The Fourth round

Thompson vs Zandschulp H2H Pick , could play in The Third round

Nakashima vs Zandschulp H2H Pick , could play in The Third round

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ugo Humbert

Wimbledon - London

Tiafoe vs Humbert H2H Prediction , could play in The Fourth round

Coric vs Humbert H2H Prediction , could play in The Fourth round

Vukic vs Humbert H2H Prediction , could play in The Fourth round

Alcaraz vs Humbert H2H Prediction , could play in The Fourth round

Thompson vs Humbert H2H Prediction , could play in The Third round

Nakashima vs Humbert H2H Prediction , could play in The Third round

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions