Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 50.07% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 53.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 51.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.46% and 35.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 61.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Jubb winning 67.74% (W/L 42/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Jubb winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Jubb was at the cinch Championships - London, 14-06-2022, First, Grass with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Jubb have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 1, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.33 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 292.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 34.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 44.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Jubb
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
372
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
63% (327-193)
Career Total W/L
69% (189-83)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$2,840,375
Career Prize Money
$54,540
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Jubb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:53 | 2:36:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (71/110) | 55% (57/103) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (49/71) | 72% (41/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (19/39) | 41% (19/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 21% (3/14) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (43/103) | 38% (42/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Jubb H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Paul Jubb
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (15/27) | 63% (45/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (191/231) | 55% (388/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 71% (10/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 125 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:52:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.95 | 275.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (848/1344) | 61% (1325/2158) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (573/848) | 72% (957/1325) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (234/496) | 55% (457/833) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (39/114) | 41% (96/234) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (486/1321) | 41% (955/2325) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (19/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 36% (11/4) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Jubb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paul Jubb
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
