Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Michal Schmid Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Schmid analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Michal Schmid Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 50.07% of points on his second serve, while Schmid has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schmid has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.46% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schmid has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Schmid winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Schmid has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 14/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Schmid has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Schmid winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Schmid was at the Netherlands F5, 16-08-2016, First, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Schmid have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Schmid 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Schmid 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.33 while Schmid has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schmid has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 34.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schmid has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Schmid
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
373
High
35
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
63% (327-193)
Career Total W/L
56% (262-207)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,840,375
Career Prize Money
$1,325
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Schmid H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Michal Schmid |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) | 57% (35/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (22/27) | 54% (19/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 50% (13/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (29/61) | 27% (14/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Schmid H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Michal Schmid
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Michal Schmid |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (15/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (191/231) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.95 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (848/1344) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (573/848) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (234/496) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (39/114) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (486/1321) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Michal Schmid Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilija Vucic
Player
Michal Schmid
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
12
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Michal Schmid
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien De Cuyper
Player
Michal Schmid
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Michal Schmid
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alon Elia
Player
Michal Schmid
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michal Schmid
Player
Marek Gengel
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Michal Schmid
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Michal Schmid
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Schmid
Player
Bastian Wagner
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Schmid
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
84%
(
58 of
69)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Schmid Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
