Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Over the past six months, Zandschulp has outperformed Gigante in terms of second serve success, securing 44.36% of points compared to Gigante’s 39.33%. This performance indicator holds substantial weight in accurately predicting match outcomes. Additionally, return game statistics reveal that while Gigante edges out Zandschulp by winning 47.85% of second serve return points against opponents, Zandschulp is not far behind with 46.92%. However, Zandschulp slightly surpasses Gigante on first serve returns, capturing 26.57% compared to 26.19%, numbers that significantly correlate with deciphering who might dominate their head-to-head matchup.

The ability to handle pressure points is crucial in tennis, and recent figures demonstrate that Zandschulp has successfully saved 55.31% of breakpoints faced, a modest advantage over Gigante's 50.81%. Looking at their performance trajectory over the past year offers additional insight: Zandschulp has won 50.75% of his matches, whereas Gigante boasts a slightly higher win rate at 52.83%. This head-to-head overview suggests a tight contest.

Surface-specific statistics are also revealing; Zandschulp shines on indoor hard courts with a 63% win rate, while Gigante excels on hard courts, boasting a 72% win rate. Conversely, Zandschulp struggles on grass (46% win rate), while Gigante finds indoor hard courts challenging, with a 26% winning percentage. The tour level further accentuates their differences: Zandschulp competes primarily in Main tour events, winning 46.15% of his matches, whereas Gigante predominantly plays in Challengers/ITF tournaments, capturing a 54.55% win rate.

Examining the quality of their opposition, Zandschulp faces opponents ranked around 121.7 on average, much higher than Gigante, who competes against players with an average rank of 180.13. Notably, if this encounter reaches a deciding set, historical data favors Gigante, who has a 67% success rate in such circumstances, compared to Zandschulp's 45% over the past year.

As both competitors enter this current event, previous achievements should be balanced against real-time performance indicators. With the ability to convert breakpoints, Gigante again holds a slight edge, converting 31.43% of opportunities, whereas Zandschulp achieves a rate of 28.67%. Collectively, these statistics suggest that while both players are evenly matched on many fronts, Gigante might be poised for a slight advantage based on recent trends and capability in deciding moments. Therefore, Gigante emerges as the likely favorite to win this closely contested match.