Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Leonardo Mayer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Mayer analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Leonardo Mayer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.53% of points on his second serve, while Mayer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 50.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mayer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.81% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mayer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with Mayer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Mayer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 309/ 209), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 19/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14), where as Mayer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Mayer winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Mayer was at the French Open - Paris, 24-05-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Mayer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Mayer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 1, and Mayer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 154.36 while Mayer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mayer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mayer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Mayer
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
21
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (326-192)
Career Total W/L
56% (478-372)
35% (6-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,830,210
Career Prize Money
$3,668,905
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Mayer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Leonardo Mayer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:20:0 | 2:20:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (63/90) | 52% (48/93) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (41/63) | 69% (33/48) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 40% (18/45) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 75% (6/8) |
Return Points W% | 45% (42/93) | 40% (36/90) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Zandschulp VS Mayer H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Leonardo Mayer
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Leonardo Mayer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 35% (13/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (167/205) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.47 | 0 |
Aces Total | 84 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 173.65 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (726/1146) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (498/726) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (200/420) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (32/88) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (406/1136) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Leonardo Mayer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Leonardo Mayer
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Leonardo Mayer
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
93%
(
56 of
60)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
17 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Leonardo Mayer
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Taro Daniel
Player
Leonardo Mayer
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
11
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Leonardo Mayer
Player
Juan Ignacio Londero
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Leonardo Mayer
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Leonardo Mayer
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexandre Muller
Player
Leonardo Mayer
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Leonardo Mayer
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
12
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Leonardo Mayer
Player
Luca Vanni
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H |
view more