B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jesper De Jong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L W
Form
W W W L W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Jong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Jong winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Jong was at the Amersfoort Challenger, 16-07-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Jesper De Jong | 0 |
Amersfoort Challenger(16-07-2021)
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Jong H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
5 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Jong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:13:35 | Average Match Time | 1:13:35 |
| 64% (28/44) | 1st Serve % | 55% (36/66) |
| 75% (21/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (23/36) |
| 44% (7/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (5/30) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 58% (38/66) | Return Points Win % | 36% (16/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Jesper De Jong
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Sebastian Ofner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Titouan Droguet
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (363/226) | Win/Loss | 63% (266/159) |
| 58% (826/589) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (587/385) |
| 53% (7093/6267) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5030/4193) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (87/43) |
| 62% (170/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (154/85) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (21/24) |
| 46% (11/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2874 | Aces Total | 1709 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2136 | Total Double Faults | 1082 |
| 1:35:28 | Average Match Time | 1:39:28 |
| 385.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.33 |
| 62% (23961/38923) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17256/28649) |
| 71% (17121/23961) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (12090/17256) |
| 48% (7213/14965) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5809/11393) |
| 43% (1773/4112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1315/3076) |
| 41% (16314/40115) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11985/28911) |
| 62% (32/20) | Slam W/L | 61% (20/13) |
| 51% (26/25) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (66/65) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (15/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 61% (125/81) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 69% (105/47) |
| 62% (336/538) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (254/406) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 55% (100/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (74/145) |
| 58% (112/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (65/125) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (261/231) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (261/30) |
| 24% (245/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (164/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
