Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Casper Ruud Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Ruud analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Casper Ruud Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.66% of points on his second serve, while Ruud has won 54.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 50.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ruud has won 49.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.92% and 30.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruud has saved 70.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 44% of matches played (W/L 22/ 28), with Ruud winning 70.67% (W/L 53/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Ruud has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 222/ 99), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40% of matches (W/L 10/ 15), where as Ruud has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 73.53% of matches (W/L 25/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Zandschulp winning 3 times. They have played 16 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 8 and Ruud winning 8. The last match between Zandschulp and Ruud was at the Millennium Estoril Open - Estoril, 04-04-2024, Second, Clay with Casper Ruud getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Ruud have played a deciding set 2 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Ruud 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 1, and Ruud 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.02 while Ruud has played against players with an average rank of 146.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruud has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruud has converted 38.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 3 - 3 Ruud
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
3
Total3
2
Hard0
1
Clay3
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
6
Rank
2
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
63% (326-193)
Career Total W/L
65% (384-205)
33% (6-12)
YTD W/L
79% (27-7)
$2,830,210
Career Prize Money
$10,219,435
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Ruud H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Casper Ruud |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 8 |
| Games Won | 76 | 81 |
| Aces (Total) | 34 | 18 |
| DFs (Total) | 18 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:38 | 2:13:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (328/526) | 66% (335/511) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (227/328) | 69% (230/335) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (93/198) | 55% (96/176) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (16/40) | 28% (17/60) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (185/511) | 39% (206/526) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 50% (2/1) |
Zandschulp VS Ruud H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(1) |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Casper Ruud
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
48 of
64)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Casper Ruud
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Casper Ruud
56%
(
70 of
124)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
56%
(
30 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
34%
(
42 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Casper Ruud |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (6/12) | 79% (27/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (13/26) | 71% (59/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (177/218) | 57% (449/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 77% (17/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 82% (9/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 87 | 180 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:24 | 1:47:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 166.83 | 128.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (800/1251) | 65% (1562/2396) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (544/800) | 75% (1170/1562) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (213/451) | 55% (457/834) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (33/93) | 39% (94/239) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (431/1211) | 38% (906/2396) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 75% (9/3) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 83% (15/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 81% (25/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 100% (24/24) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (24/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 30% (10/3) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Casper Ruud Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Alexandre Muller
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Casper Ruud
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Novak Djokovic
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Ugo Humbert
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Casper Ruud
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
108)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
38 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Marton Fucsovics
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Ruud Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Casper Ruud
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
