Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] vs Ben Shelton [15th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W L W L
Form
W W W L L L W W W WHead-2-Head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Shelton
They have played 5 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Shelton winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Shelton was at the BMW Open - Munich, 16-04-2025, Second, Clay with Ben Shelton getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Ben Shelton | 1 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (9-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (14-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 89 | Ranking | 15 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 12 |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 62% (362-226) | Career Total W/L | 65% (142-77) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $6,658,850 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Shelton H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Zandschulp VS Shelton H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 28 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:44:39 | Average Match Time | 0:44:39 |
| 59% (40/68) | 1st Serve % | 68% (40/59) |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (33/40) |
| 50% (14/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (11/19) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 25% (15/59) | Return Points Win % | 40% (27/68) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ben Shelton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Shelton
Editorial Prediction:
When two formidable players like Zandschulp and Shelton face off, fans are keen to dissect every bit of their gameplay statistics to predict the victor. Let's begin with their second serve performance over the last six months. Is Zandschulp struggling, winning only 43.6% of points? Meanwhile, Shelton secures a notable 52.8%, giving him a slight edge in that department. The correlation between second serve stats and match outcomes cannot be overlooked.
Now, what about their performance when tasked with returning serves? Zandschulp is aptly aggressive, winning 46.95% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Shelton's 38.74%. For first serves, Zandschulp again exceeds expectation at 27.55%, with Shelton slightly trailing at 22.19%. These return stats are crucial in head-to-head matchups, painting a picture of who might control the rally better.
In the heat of the match, who keeps their cool under pressure? Zandschulp has a breakpoint save rate of 51.57% but Shelton counters with an even more impressive 57.05%. Knowing when and how these players dig deep could be pivotal for live betting enthusiasts as the match progresses.
Let's stretch our view to their performance over the past year. Zandschulp has clinched 52.17% of his matches (W/L 36/33), contrasting with Shelton's more favorable 59.38% win rate (W/L 38/26). This brings a broader context to their head-to-head prediction. When examining their preferred playing surfaces, both shine brightest on indoor hard courts. Zandschulp wins 63% (W/L 93/54) on this surface, but Shelton outdoes him with a striking 77% win rate (W/L 40/12).
Each player's experience on the main tour matters. Zandschulp has emerged victorious in 46.43% of his matches (W/L 13/15), whereas Shelton's win rate is 54.17% (W/L 13/11). The quality of their opponents affects how these figures translate into the upcoming battle; Zandschulp's foes have had an average rank of 151.75, with Shelton's slightly lower at 159.13. Their previous showdown at the U.S. Open saw Zandschulp triumphing in a tight three-set battle, suggesting a mental edge.
If this clash extends to a deciding set, it’s a close call. Zandschulp holds a 46% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, marginally less than Shelton's 48%. And when it comes to converting break points, Zandschulp proves more efficient, capitalizing on 30.99% of his chances, while Shelton lags at 22.33%.
So, who will emerge victorious in this thrilling contest? While both players exhibit remarkable skills, Zandschulp's superior return stats and breakpoint conversion, along with his previous head-to-head win against Shelton, sway the prediction in his favor. Expect Zandschulp to edge out Shelton in what promises to be an electrifying match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Shelton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Luciano Darderi
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Borna Gojo
54%
(
62 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
9
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
57 of
68)
69%
(
36 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
26%
(
30 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Ben Shelton
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Ben Shelton
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Karen Khachanov
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (362/226) | Win/Loss | 65% (142/77) |
| 58% (824/589) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (346/228) |
| 53% (7081/6262) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3085/2778) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.66 |
| 2872 | Aces Total | 1899 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 2134 | Total Double Faults | 786 |
| 1:35:30 | Average Match Time | 1:55:24 |
| 383.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 182.95 |
| 62% (23929/38869) | 1st Serve % | 65% (11468/17708) |
| 71% (17094/23929) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (8623/11468) |
| 48% (7201/14943) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (3384/6240) |
| 43% (1770/4108) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (504/1281) |
| 41% (16289/40062) | Return Points Win % | 34% (6063/17674) |
| 62% (335/537) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (116/183) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 71% (24/34) |
| 55% (100/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (76/139) |
| 58% (112/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (44/81) |
| 89% (341/302) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (122/105) |
| 11% (341/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (122/17) |
| 24% (245/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 37% (97/36) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
