B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Adrian Mannarino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L W
Form
W L W L W W W L L LHead-To-Head: Zandschulp 4 - 1 Mannarino
They have played 11 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 8 and Mannarino winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Mannarino was at the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai, 26-02-2024, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 4 |
| Adrian Mannarino | 1 |
Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai(26-02-2024)
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sevastova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Mannarino H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Mannarino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 59 | Games Won | 53 |
| 30 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
| 21 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:51:40 | Average Match Time | 1:51:40 |
| 64% (225/351) | 1st Serve % | 62% (225/361) |
| 69% (156/225) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (149/225) |
| 49% (62/126) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (65/136) |
| 47% (15/32) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (12/35) |
| 41% (147/361) | Return Points Win % | 38% (133/351) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Mannarino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Adrian Mannarino
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Adrian Mannarino
43%
(
36 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
10
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Bernard Tomic
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
41%
(
33 of
80)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Nicolas Mejia
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Aidan Mayo
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Adrian Mannarino
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(0) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (363/226) | Win/Loss | 55% (680/562) |
| 58% (826/589) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1607/1415) |
| 53% (7093/6267) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (14719/14077) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (270/204) |
| 62% (170/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (80/128) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (236/166) |
| 46% (11/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (94/64) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2874 | Aces Total | 4472 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2136 | Total Double Faults | 2359 |
| 1:35:28 | Average Match Time | 1:15:56 |
| 385.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.06 |
| 62% (23961/38923) | 1st Serve % | 60% (43150/71685) |
| 71% (17121/23961) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (30206/43150) |
| 48% (7213/14965) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14702/28535) |
| 43% (1773/4112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2713/6448) |
| 41% (16314/40115) | Return Points Win % | 38% (27260/72053) |
| 62% (32/20) | Slam W/L | 48% (64/68) |
| 51% (26/25) | Masters W/L | 42% (73/102) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 80% (8/2) |
| 50% (66/65) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (234/224) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 64% (200/112) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 65% (101/54) |
| 62% (336/538) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (626/1123) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (50/112) |
| 55% (100/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (208/421) |
| 58% (112/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (203/386) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (657/552) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (657/103) |
| 24% (245/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (584/124) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
